------- Comment #16 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-28 20:15 ------- > Well, I think it may be more complicated. Have I mentioned > how much I hate TRANSFER. :(
Well, I didn't do much with TRANSFER, but I fully understand you. > To make matters worse, with trunk I see > call sub(x,0.) > i = x > NaN -2147483648 > FFC00000 Looks OK to me as run-time behaviour. If you want to catch this, simply compile gfortran with -ffpe-trap=invalid. > gfc_mpfr_to_mpz but also gfc_real2int and gfc_complex2int. I don't think so. You have in gfc_real2int the call: gfc_mpfr_to_mpz (result->value.integer, src->value.real); and in gfc_complex2int you have gfc_mpfr_to_mpz (result->value.integer, src->value.complex.r); Thus you really only need to modify gfc_mpfr_to_mpz. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37930
