------- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-22 10:01 -------
Downgrading to P2, the patches so far all seem to be quite risky for the
branches, the wrong-code is on a corner case and isn't a recent regression.
Regarding the comment #14 patch, I'd say the complete_type should be different
from argtype only when !TYPE_UNSIGNED (argtype), for unsigned char or unsigned
short the overflow behavior is well defined.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P1 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35634
