------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-20 13:39 -------
Thanks. I guess the vect fallout needs to be dealt with separately. Now, I
think gimplification time is not the best here, can we maybe move this to
general gimplification code if we change the {PRE,POST}{IN,DE}CREMENT_EXPR
to have the type the increment is done in (and the expression result) be
TREE_TYPE of that expression? This way the generic gimplification code
would need to make sure to lower it properly.
Diego, I suppose this lowering is before tuples come into play and we loose
this extra type, right?
Of course this may need auditing of the FEs wrt correctness of the type
in this expression but feels like a more general fix?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35634
