------- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-12 13:54 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] Revision 128239 causes libgomp failure
>
> Hi,
> I´ve just tested ia64-linux and x86_64-linux on our testers and both are
> clean WRT libgomp:
> === libgomp Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 496
> it might be some sort of race condition (I sometimes see libgomp
> failures appear and go such as:
Have you compared the times to take for "make check" on libgomp between
revision 128238 and HEAD? With C libgomp tests only, revision 128238 takes
less than 15 seconds on a 1.5GHz ia64 machine. Revision 128239 takes more
than 20 minutes plus random failures.
>
> libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 execution test
>
> One obvious difference is that we now consider functions produced by OMP
> lowering inlinable. This can be avoided by:
>
> Index: omp-low.c
> ===================================================================
> *** omp-low.c (revision 128412)
> --- omp-low.c (working copy)
> *************** expand_omp_parallel (struct omp_region *
> *** 2589,2594 ****
> --- 2589,2595 ----
> /* Inform the callgraph about the new function. */
> DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (child_fn)->curr_properties
> = cfun->curr_properties;
> + DECL_UNINLINABLE (child_fn) = true;
> cgraph_add_new_function (child_fn, true);
>
> /* Fix the callgraph edges for child_cfun. Those for cfun will be
>
It makes no differences to me.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33389
