------- Comment #7 from aribrei at arcor dot de 2007-08-02 16:34 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I should note that I do NOT want to see this bug fixed. I would prefer to > > hear > > that you won't "fix" it at all. So I can exploit this behavior as there is > > no > > standards-compliant way of achieving the same results. > > Is it possible that rvalue references will give you an alternative for the > desired effect? See the relevant papers linked to from here: > > http://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2291.html >
This would mean that instead of A::A(A &), I wrote A::A(A &&) and passing temporaries would automatically work? (Not sure if I correctly understand the r-value reference proposal.) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32658
