------- Comment #8 from widman at gimpel dot com 2007-08-02 17:07 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Is it possible that rvalue references will give you an alternative for the
> > desired effect? See the relevant papers linked to from here:
> >
> > http://open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2291.html
> >
>
> This would mean that instead of A::A(A &), I wrote A::A(A &&) and passing
> temporaries would automatically work?
That's correct. Rvalues would bind directly to the 'A&&' parameter; you could
even have two ctors:
struct A {
A(const A&); // copy ctor
A(A&&); // move ctor
};
...and when you initialize an 'A' with an rvalue, overload resolution will
select the move ctor.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32658
