------- Comment #55 from ian at airs dot com  2007-05-12 19:43 -------
Regarding comment #52: do you have a reasonably sized test case?  I didn't see
any problems when I ran the C++ testsuite.

I think tree-ssa-operands.c does the right thing:

    case CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR:
      get_expr_operands (stmt, &CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_LOCATION (expr), opf_use);
      return;

But there may well be something I misunderstand.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286

Reply via email to