------- Comment #55 from ian at airs dot com 2007-05-12 19:43 ------- Regarding comment #52: do you have a reasonably sized test case? I didn't see any problems when I ran the C++ testsuite.
I think tree-ssa-operands.c does the right thing: case CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_EXPR: get_expr_operands (stmt, &CHANGE_DYNAMIC_TYPE_LOCATION (expr), opf_use); return; But there may well be something I misunderstand. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286