------- Comment #59 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 05:00 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] placement new does not change the dynamic type as it should
On 14 May 2007 03:45:25 -0000, ian at airs dot com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ------- Comment #58 from ian at airs dot com 2007-05-14 04:45 ------- > Created an attachment (id=13551) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13551&action=view) > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13551&action=view) > Patch > > That test case turns out to be an oversight in my patch to tree-ssa-dce.c. > Here is the new patch against mainline, which has a one line change to > tree-ssa-dce.c compared to the old patch. I believe your tree-ssa-dce part is wrong. I see no reason for them to be marked always necessary. They are only necessary if the result is used, passed somewhere else, etc. These should be properly marked in the regular course of DCE. > > > -- > > ian at airs dot com changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Attachment #13543|0 |1 > is obsolete| | > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29286
