------- Comment #14 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-01-10 22:09 ------- Subject: Re: testsuite failures in actual_array_constructor_2.f90 and actual_array_substr_2.f90
Kaveh > ------- Comment #13 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-10 21:45 > ------- > Paul - The bug is not "FIXED" in 4.0, please don't mark it as such yet. > "WONTFIX" may be a more accurate description if that is the group decision. > You can remove yourself from the assigned field if you aren't able to work on > it. > I am sorry, but I genuinely thought that only the testscases were present: I checked out fortran and the testsuite from gcc-4_0-branch and could not find any trace of this patch in the ChangeLogs but the testcases ARE there. On this basis, I thought that there was nothing to fix. > Regarding your last checkin to 4.0, the archives seem to show that you were > the > one who checked in the testcase and the fortran patches. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/branches/gcc-4_0-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_2.f90?view=log > > So I'm somewhat mystified by your "hands unknown" comment. :-) > The evidence is incontrovertible :-) OK, it is obvious that I am missing something here. Why does the 4.0 branch not reflect this patch? > Could you please take a second look? Maybe the whole patch and the testcases > should be reverted on 4.0? > Yes, please. Note that this is not a WONTFIX but rather a CANTFIX; my time is taken by other things than gcc, right now, and, additionally, I no longer have a 4.0 tree; in fact I just scrubbed 4.1 as well. I am not trying to be difficult, cantankerous or awkward - I tried to look into it and just do not understand what is going on. Cheers Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30399
