------- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-09 03:19 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Kaveh,
> As the culprit for both patches, I'll take a look.  I had no idea that there
> was and 4.1 regressions associated with them.  I'll come back to you.
> Paul

Paul - I wouldn't say you're a "culprit", all you did was supply the testcases.
 They've failed ever since you checked them in, so they very well may have
failed before then, i.e. probably not a regression.  Nevertheless, thank you
for volunteering to take a look.  Let me know if you need help testing or
whatever.
Thanks,
--Kaveh


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30399

Reply via email to