------- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 03:19 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Kaveh, > As the culprit for both patches, I'll take a look. I had no idea that there > was and 4.1 regressions associated with them. I'll come back to you. > Paul
Paul - I wouldn't say you're a "culprit", all you did was supply the testcases. They've failed ever since you checked them in, so they very well may have failed before then, i.e. probably not a regression. Nevertheless, thank you for volunteering to take a look. Let me know if you need help testing or whatever. Thanks, --Kaveh -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30399
