------- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-08-25 10:21 ------- Indeed, I was about to post similar considerations: in tr1::unordered_ the table starts from *2* and I think it's fine. I'm not so happy about changing now the table of the legacy ext containers, minimally maintained but required to be strictly backward compatible. Would it be ok with you only adding the special early return for 0 hint?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28844
