------- Comment #6 from caolanm at redhat dot com 2006-08-25 10:32 ------- Sure, up to you, but I'd say you'd still be pretty safe adding two smaller starting hash sizes.
This doesn't actually affect most OOos (at least for 95% of OOo's which exist) which are normally built against stlport for some other ABI compatibility and visibility reasons, so it's only an academic suggestion from my POV with respect to gcc stl, unless we start building OOo against "system" stl at some future point. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28844