------- Comment #17 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 03:09 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > mov %ebx,0x85ac8f4 > > We are writting to cl_options_count for some reason.
Yes, it is unnecessary, but not wrong, since if you take a closer look, it is just movl cl_options_count, %ebx ... movl %ebx, cl_options_count no change of %ebx in between, and I don't think it is the main issue, here. I still think it is just the unset third argument of the memset call. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25636
