------- Comment #19 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 03:16 ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > Yes, it is unnecessary, but not wrong, since if you take a closer look, it > > is > > just > > Actually it is wrong as it is in read only memory.
OK, then there may actually be two bugs at once. Or is my argument about the missing third argument wrong? Am I missing something somewhere? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25636
