------- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-07 21:55 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Not all of the underlying are just g77 features. Some like 18540/25705 are
> legal f90, f95, f06 code an just calling them "excremental" is unprofessional.
> This diminishes the 90% plus of dedicated people working on GCC. If something
> is clearly impoosible to continue as part of fortran then an effort to change
> the specs should be made.
Well, in looking at the code in 25705, I think the code is nonconforming via
8.1.1.2 of the Fortran 95 standard. I don't have a copy of the Fortran 90
standard, but I suspect that it will also show that the code is nonconforming.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19292
