On 18 August 2014 12:44, Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> wrote: > Is this perhaps not clear enough? I appreciate the enthusiasm, but this > groundwork is really important before we can move forward. Unless there's > anyone else who wishes to help out with this---which would mean > understanding a fair amount of fvwm internals at this point, etc., I am not > sure what else to suggest you can do for now.
I'm interested in mvwm specifically as i've already tried to port your patches to fvwm already without success. i'm worried this is turning into an 'exclusive club' at the moment. some questions - what's the contribution path to 'outsiders' like me? the roadmap (in the TODO) lists quite boring features - is this all theres going to be? have you (and others) got enough experience with fvwm to carry this off? - or do you need others to help? Thanks! Michael
