An attempt at a possible MS11-083 DoS/PoC exploit, by @hackerfantastic: http://pastebin.com/fjZ1k0fi
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Thor (Hammer of God) <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I gotta say, I’m going to use it at some point ;) > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mario Vilas > Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:02 AM > To: Ryan Dewhurst > > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP > Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516) > > > > I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit. > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I > was thinking at least. > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 <[email protected]> wrote: >>> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days >>> to send a packet, my butt. >>> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with >>> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only >>> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger >>> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like >>> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks... >>> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src >>> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to >>> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open >>> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal >>> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so , >>> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3 >>> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with >>> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing, >>> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another.. >> >> I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either >> with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know >> what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from >> what I can make of your writing). >> >> No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you >> are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > > > -- > “There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights the enemy > of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military > becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people.” _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
