Yeah, I gotta say, I'm going to use it at some point ;) From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mario Vilas Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:02 AM To: Ryan Dewhurst Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft Windows vulnerability in TCP/IP Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2588516)
I liked the "heavy breather in the perv closet" bit. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Ryan Dewhurst <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I think Jon just said what everyone else was thinking, he said what I was thinking at least. On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Jon Kertz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:59 PM, xD 0x41 > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> About the PPS, i think thats a very bad summary of the exploit, 49days >> to send a packet, my butt. >> There is many people assuming wrong things, when it can be done with >> seconds, syscanner would scan a -b class in minutes, remember it only >> has to find the vulns, gather, then it would break scan, and trigger >> vuln... so in real world botnet, yes then, with tcpip patchers, like >> somany ppl i know myself, even use (tcpipz)patcher ) , wich rocks... >> and it is ONLY one wich actually works, when you maybe modify the src >> so the sys file, is dropped from within a .cpp file, well thats up to >> you but thats better way to make it work, this will open >> sockets/threads, as i could, easily proove with one exe, but, the goal >> is, to trigger the vuln then exploit it, less than 49days :P , so , >> iguess if this exploit, in real form, gathered 2 million hosts over 3 >> nights.. i guessing that the exploit, could possibly be triggered with >> ONE properly setup packet.. people forget that, a packet is one thing, >> and a crafted UDP packet, is quite another.. > > I'd really like to see you actually explain this bug with code. Either > with a poc or with the disassembly. You seem to act like you know > what's going on, but so far your description has been off base (from > what I can make of your writing). > > No one cares about paragraphs of speculation and bragging, code or you > are just another heavy breather in the perv closet of FD. > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ -- "There's a reason we separate military and the police: one fights the enemy of the state, the other serves and protects the people. When the military becomes both, then the enemies of the state tend to become the people."
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
