15 Mind-Blowing Facts About Wealth And Inequality In America http://www.businessinsider.com/facts-about-inequality-in-america-2011-11?op=1
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Laurelai <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/14/2011 8:21 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote: > > You think I'm biting that? > > Skinny and "under-age" is just about everything you could come up with. > Congrats for creativity. > > Just because two of you decided you found common grounds for insult > doesn't mean you're god-almighty-indisputably-right in every piece of shit > you come up with. Did I mention it's shit? > > With that, I give you one, you have a point, I should have stopped > responding ever since some guy decided to equate a couple dozen of people > into America's 1%. > > Strange, thought security guys would have been better with numbers... > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Laurelai <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/14/2011 6:32 PM, xD 0x41 wrote: >> >> Cristiano , per favor' mi dai dieci minuti scusa mi ma, e' essentiale .. >> You really dont realise how much, you attack others when they post, >> NOMATTER what the topic... yet you are still wondering why somany people >> seem to despise your skinny little nerdy ass... well, nerdy isnt bad, but, >> your a downright lookalike for mr.Bean aka rowan atkinson. You could maybe >> do his stunts, to ? >> Your the one who is usually abusing others, before the finality wich is >> simply adults not reesponding, to the baby whos crying out for more >> aarguements. >> You should stfu, and learn more, you assume to know all, in every post, >> your the brain, yet you are lame, i looked everything up abiout you, and >> yes, go ahead, and setup a nice wordpress secure setting, php wise to, then >> yes, id maybe hink your atleast a halfwit ;) >> Anyhow, your basically a tr0ll, and, you seem to keep goading, even AFTER >> the others, have completely stopped responding to you, simply because, >> Laurelai was right, why would anyone want to keep up a thread wich has now >> turned malign, as i forsaw a week ago, but, i did not think it would even >> make a week, People like you, keep inspiring the flame to burn brighter.. >> wich to me, is nastier than any *abuse* names, wich, you clearly have not >> counted howmany times you have actually called others, some form of rude >> name/word/personal attack. >> Maybe when you GROW UP, and behave as an adult, then I would assume the >> list will start to hear you, even through the bs. >> Anyhow, i applaud you, for *coming out* as to say, I mean, putting your >> pic up, like that, mate, you could be a pornstar! what you doin online >> :P~~~bahahaha >> go back to grade.2 then repeate it, then move on... then, if you work out >> how to call 911, call someone who gives a shit. >> Idiotic kid, grow the hell up. >> xd-- >> >> // IND SEC CONSILTANT FOR Yep yep Security (simply coz it sounds good) YEP >> YEP for all your Hat attire needs! >> >> On 15 October 2011 08:57, Christian Sciberras <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, let's just all ignore low insults. The world would be a much better >>> place without them and whoever said them in the first place... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Laurelai <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/14/2011 2:25 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote: >>>> >>>> Resorting to personal attacks? Nice. >>>> >>>> Technical skills in what? Running a wordpress blog? Defacing a >>>> website? Growing pot? >>>> >>>> I rarely publicise any materials, most of the time I just tell whoever >>>> is responsible to do a fix. >>>> I'm not really running after publicity, unlike you guys. >>>> Also note that I never said I'm a seasoned hacker... in fact, my >>>> occupation is quite on the opposite side of the spectrum... >>>> >>>> You also seem to know more than I do what the Ubuntu VM I have >>>> contains. >>>> >>>> But that must make all the difference! I mean, people that don't know >>>> qubits from bits shouldn't be allowed in such discussions >>>> (of course there's wikipedia...) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Georgi Guninski <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Christian Sciberras, >>>>> >>>>> I have trouble judging your technical skills - all I have seen is bad >>>>> smalltalk. >>>>> >>>>> Do you have any technical publications you can share so I can judge? >>>>> >>>>> btw, the best i found was you could could reproduce a bug in a CMS and >>>>> in addition you can't tell root from user password on vanilla ubuntu. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> joro >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:11:13AM +0200, Christian Sciberras wrote: >>>>> > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok? >>>>> > >>>>> > No. But it's certainly better than doing damage without profit. >>>>> Making >>>>> > profit means that at the end of the day, the money's going to go >>>>> somewhere >>>>> > further in the chain. >>>>> > Flattening a tower, for instance, or attacking the local bank that >>>>> refused >>>>> > to give you a loan because of the time you spent in a cell, isn't as >>>>> > productive. >>>>> > Neither is it making a company loose clients/profit just because they >>>>> > decided they don't want you to use their services (as if you did have >>>>> a >>>>> > right in the first place...). >>>>> > >>>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a measure of >>>>> responsibility >>>>> > in the situation too, human beings are by nature imperfect, but the >>>>> largest >>>>> > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below. >>>>> > >>>>> > The largest share? I can see Ex-president Bush trying to sell you a >>>>> bottle >>>>> > of beer for $10 dollars ($7 profit). Wait, I can't. >>>>> > >>>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back every dime of >>>>> it, >>>>> > most people are decent human beings and would do the same. >>>>> > >>>>> > Most people? I could have sworn 90% of the people in the NYC subway >>>>> would >>>>> > thank $deity if you suddenly dropped dead so they could get things >>>>> off you. >>>>> > Call me cynical, but I wouldn't trust anyone else in such cases, >>>>> other than >>>>> > myself. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Regarding that list of yours, great! Now we just need a little more >>>>> effort. >>>>> > For each of those persons, please enlighten us as to what they did >>>>> legally >>>>> > wrong. >>>>> > Of course, the people that landed in jail shouldn't be counted. The >>>>> "99% >>>>> > protest" is a modern one committed to change, it just can't right >>>>> wrongs by >>>>> > pointing at jailed people. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Laurelai <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > On 10/13/2011 9:18 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > I simply acknowledge the fact that some people work hard to get >>>>> "obscenely >>>>> > > rich", but I just can't stand people that cause damage for the fun >>>>> of it. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Yes, I stick for everyone that minds his business, instead of >>>>> ruining >>>>> > > others' for the fun of it. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > What bothers me is the fact that those hypocrites (protesters) are >>>>> crying >>>>> > > out loud against some people they're highly envious of with the >>>>> excuse of >>>>> > > "the depression". >>>>> > > Well, here's the news; the famous depression has been brought about >>>>> by >>>>> > > these same people! >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a measure of >>>>> responsibility >>>>> > > in the situation too, human beings are by nature imperfect, but the >>>>> largest >>>>> > > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > If someone above is collecting free money because of incentives >>>>> for >>>>> > > people to spend money (and which seem to work well), I can't blame >>>>> him. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Yes because trickle down theory worked *so* well >>>>> > > >>>>> > > How many times in your life have you paid back something you >>>>> received by >>>>> > > mistake and which wasn't yours? >>>>> > > While I would foremost applaud anyone that would right such a >>>>> wrong, I just >>>>> > > can't ignore the fact that those people out there representing the >>>>> "99%" are >>>>> > > big-time hypocrites. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back every dime of >>>>> it, >>>>> > > most people are decent human beings and would do the same. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On a different argument, since you seem to know well enough how >>>>> some of >>>>> > > the 1% are doing immoral things, why don't you start by handing out >>>>> names >>>>> > > instead of talking air just as the "99%" crowd has been doing up >>>>> till now? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > *Alan Greenspan, chairman of US Federal Reserve 1987- 2006 >>>>> > > **Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England >>>>> > > **Bill Clinton, former US president* >>>>> > > *Gordon Brown, prime minister* >>>>> > > *George W Bush, former US president* >>>>> > > *Senator Phil Gramm >>>>> > > **Abby Cohen, Goldman Sachs chief US strategist >>>>> > > **Kathleen Corbet, former CEO, Standard & Poor's >>>>> > > **"Hank" Greenberg, AIG insurance group >>>>> > > **Andy Hornby, former HBOS boss >>>>> > > **Steve Crawshaw, former B&B boss >>>>> > > **Adam Applegarth, former Northern Rock boss >>>>> > > **Dick Fuld, Lehman Brothers chief executive >>>>> > > **Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin >>>>> > > **Lewis Ranieri >>>>> > > **Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products >>>>> > > **Chuck Prince, former Citi boss >>>>> > > **Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Financial >>>>> > > **Stan O'Neal, former boss of Merrill Lynch* >>>>> > > *Jimmy Cayne, former Bear Stearns boss >>>>> > > **Christopher Dodd, chairman, Senate banking committee (Democrat) >>>>> > > **Geir Haarde, Icelandic prime minister >>>>> > > **John Tiner, FSA chief executive, 2003-07* >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Oh yeah and lets not forget about this guy >>>>> > > >>>>> http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877337,00.html >>>>> > > And while he is thankfully spending time in a prison cell, so many >>>>> other >>>>> > > names on this list go free, in fact a good chunk of them made a >>>>> profit off >>>>> > > of the disaster. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Lets keep the discussion above the belt guys ok? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> >> Whats wrong with being skinny? *ducks* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> > > I was actually talking to Xd as im rather skinny myself :s > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
