You think I'm biting that? Skinny and "under-age" is just about everything you could come up with. Congrats for creativity.
Just because two of you decided you found common grounds for insult doesn't mean you're god-almighty-indisputably-right in every piece of shit you come up with. Did I mention it's shit? With that, I give you one, you have a point, I should have stopped responding ever since some guy decided to equate a couple dozen of people into America's 1%. Strange, thought security guys would have been better with numbers... On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Laurelai <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/14/2011 6:32 PM, xD 0x41 wrote: > > Cristiano , per favor' mi dai dieci minuti scusa mi ma, e' essentiale .. > You really dont realise how much, you attack others when they post, > NOMATTER what the topic... yet you are still wondering why somany people > seem to despise your skinny little nerdy ass... well, nerdy isnt bad, but, > your a downright lookalike for mr.Bean aka rowan atkinson. You could maybe > do his stunts, to ? > Your the one who is usually abusing others, before the finality wich is > simply adults not reesponding, to the baby whos crying out for more > aarguements. > You should stfu, and learn more, you assume to know all, in every post, > your the brain, yet you are lame, i looked everything up abiout you, and > yes, go ahead, and setup a nice wordpress secure setting, php wise to, then > yes, id maybe hink your atleast a halfwit ;) > Anyhow, your basically a tr0ll, and, you seem to keep goading, even AFTER > the others, have completely stopped responding to you, simply because, > Laurelai was right, why would anyone want to keep up a thread wich has now > turned malign, as i forsaw a week ago, but, i did not think it would even > make a week, People like you, keep inspiring the flame to burn brighter.. > wich to me, is nastier than any *abuse* names, wich, you clearly have not > counted howmany times you have actually called others, some form of rude > name/word/personal attack. > Maybe when you GROW UP, and behave as an adult, then I would assume the > list will start to hear you, even through the bs. > Anyhow, i applaud you, for *coming out* as to say, I mean, putting your pic > up, like that, mate, you could be a pornstar! what you doin online > :P~~~bahahaha > go back to grade.2 then repeate it, then move on... then, if you work out > how to call 911, call someone who gives a shit. > Idiotic kid, grow the hell up. > xd-- > > // IND SEC CONSILTANT FOR Yep yep Security (simply coz it sounds good) YEP > YEP for all your Hat attire needs! > > On 15 October 2011 08:57, Christian Sciberras <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah, let's just all ignore low insults. The world would be a much better >> place without them and whoever said them in the first place... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Laurelai <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 10/14/2011 2:25 PM, Christian Sciberras wrote: >>> >>> Resorting to personal attacks? Nice. >>> >>> Technical skills in what? Running a wordpress blog? Defacing a website? >>> Growing pot? >>> >>> I rarely publicise any materials, most of the time I just tell whoever >>> is responsible to do a fix. >>> I'm not really running after publicity, unlike you guys. >>> Also note that I never said I'm a seasoned hacker... in fact, my >>> occupation is quite on the opposite side of the spectrum... >>> >>> You also seem to know more than I do what the Ubuntu VM I have >>> contains. >>> >>> But that must make all the difference! I mean, people that don't know >>> qubits from bits shouldn't be allowed in such discussions >>> (of course there's wikipedia...) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Georgi Guninski >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Christian Sciberras, >>>> >>>> I have trouble judging your technical skills - all I have seen is bad >>>> smalltalk. >>>> >>>> Do you have any technical publications you can share so I can judge? >>>> >>>> btw, the best i found was you could could reproduce a bug in a CMS and >>>> in addition you can't tell root from user password on vanilla ubuntu. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> joro >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:11:13AM +0200, Christian Sciberras wrote: >>>> > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok? >>>> > >>>> > No. But it's certainly better than doing damage without profit. Making >>>> > profit means that at the end of the day, the money's going to go >>>> somewhere >>>> > further in the chain. >>>> > Flattening a tower, for instance, or attacking the local bank that >>>> refused >>>> > to give you a loan because of the time you spent in a cell, isn't as >>>> > productive. >>>> > Neither is it making a company loose clients/profit just because they >>>> > decided they don't want you to use their services (as if you did have >>>> a >>>> > right in the first place...). >>>> > >>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a measure of >>>> responsibility >>>> > in the situation too, human beings are by nature imperfect, but the >>>> largest >>>> > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below. >>>> > >>>> > The largest share? I can see Ex-president Bush trying to sell you a >>>> bottle >>>> > of beer for $10 dollars ($7 profit). Wait, I can't. >>>> > >>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back every dime of >>>> it, >>>> > most people are decent human beings and would do the same. >>>> > >>>> > Most people? I could have sworn 90% of the people in the NYC subway >>>> would >>>> > thank $deity if you suddenly dropped dead so they could get things off >>>> you. >>>> > Call me cynical, but I wouldn't trust anyone else in such cases, other >>>> than >>>> > myself. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Regarding that list of yours, great! Now we just need a little more >>>> effort. >>>> > For each of those persons, please enlighten us as to what they did >>>> legally >>>> > wrong. >>>> > Of course, the people that landed in jail shouldn't be counted. The >>>> "99% >>>> > protest" is a modern one committed to change, it just can't right >>>> wrongs by >>>> > pointing at jailed people. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Laurelai <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > On 10/13/2011 9:18 AM, Christian Sciberras wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > I simply acknowledge the fact that some people work hard to get >>>> "obscenely >>>> > > rich", but I just can't stand people that cause damage for the fun >>>> of it. >>>> > > >>>> > > So if they cause damage for profit that makes it ok? >>>> > > >>>> > > Yes, I stick for everyone that minds his business, instead of >>>> ruining >>>> > > others' for the fun of it. >>>> > > >>>> > > What bothers me is the fact that those hypocrites (protesters) are >>>> crying >>>> > > out loud against some people they're highly envious of with the >>>> excuse of >>>> > > "the depression". >>>> > > Well, here's the news; the famous depression has been brought about >>>> by >>>> > > these same people! >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > And yes I acknowledge the American public has a measure of >>>> responsibility >>>> > > in the situation too, human beings are by nature imperfect, but the >>>> largest >>>> > > share of responsibility lies with the names listed below. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > If someone above is collecting free money because of incentives for >>>> > > people to spend money (and which seem to work well), I can't blame >>>> him. >>>> > > >>>> > > Yes because trickle down theory worked *so* well >>>> > > >>>> > > How many times in your life have you paid back something you >>>> received by >>>> > > mistake and which wasn't yours? >>>> > > While I would foremost applaud anyone that would right such a wrong, >>>> I just >>>> > > can't ignore the fact that those people out there representing the >>>> "99%" are >>>> > > big-time hypocrites. >>>> > > >>>> > > That sort of thing has happened to me and I paid back every dime of >>>> it, >>>> > > most people are decent human beings and would do the same. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > On a different argument, since you seem to know well enough how >>>> some of >>>> > > the 1% are doing immoral things, why don't you start by handing out >>>> names >>>> > > instead of talking air just as the "99%" crowd has been doing up >>>> till now? >>>> > > >>>> > > *Alan Greenspan, chairman of US Federal Reserve 1987- 2006 >>>> > > **Mervyn King, governor of the Bank of England >>>> > > **Bill Clinton, former US president* >>>> > > *Gordon Brown, prime minister* >>>> > > *George W Bush, former US president* >>>> > > *Senator Phil Gramm >>>> > > **Abby Cohen, Goldman Sachs chief US strategist >>>> > > **Kathleen Corbet, former CEO, Standard & Poor's >>>> > > **"Hank" Greenberg, AIG insurance group >>>> > > **Andy Hornby, former HBOS boss >>>> > > **Steve Crawshaw, former B&B boss >>>> > > **Adam Applegarth, former Northern Rock boss >>>> > > **Dick Fuld, Lehman Brothers chief executive >>>> > > **Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin >>>> > > **Lewis Ranieri >>>> > > **Joseph Cassano, AIG Financial Products >>>> > > **Chuck Prince, former Citi boss >>>> > > **Angelo Mozilo, Countrywide Financial >>>> > > **Stan O'Neal, former boss of Merrill Lynch* >>>> > > *Jimmy Cayne, former Bear Stearns boss >>>> > > **Christopher Dodd, chairman, Senate banking committee (Democrat) >>>> > > **Geir Haarde, Icelandic prime minister >>>> > > **John Tiner, FSA chief executive, 2003-07* >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > Oh yeah and lets not forget about this guy >>>> > > >>>> http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1877351_1877350_1877337,00.html >>>> > > And while he is thankfully spending time in a prison cell, so many >>>> other >>>> > > names on this list go free, in fact a good chunk of them made a >>>> profit off >>>> > > of the disaster. >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Lets keep the discussion above the belt guys ok? >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ > > Whats wrong with being skinny? *ducks* > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
