D'autant plus intéressant que cela ne parait a priori pas possible selon
les règles des contrats LRSA:
13. If a legacy resource holder decides to sign the Legacy RSA, but
their organization name is different from the one currently registered
in the ARIN Whois database, can they still fill out the legacy
application and sign the Legacy RSA?
If the organization’s name has changed due to a merger or
acquisition type of activity, then the recipient organization must
complete a transfer with ARIN and sign the standard RSA. Under this
circumstance, they would not be allowed to sign the LRSA since they
were not the original recipients of the legacy resources.
On 18/04/2011 22:50, Patrick Maigron wrote:
Un point intéressant est qu'on a précisé (ajouts en bleu) les éléments
concernant l'ARIN : la vente ne sera effective que lorsqu'un contrat
LRSA sera signé entre l'ARIN et Microsoft (Legacy Registration Services
Agreement : contrat spécifique aux ressources obtenues avant la création
de l'ARIN).
https://www.arin.net/resources/legacy/
Patrick.
Le 18/04/2011 21:43, Michel Py a écrit :
http://blog.internetgovernance.org/pdf/NNI-MSFT-ipsale.pdf
Bon courage; dans le genre indigeste, c'est pas mal.
Michel.
---------------------------
Liste de diffusion du FRnOG
http://www.frnog.org/