Why is this build with sbcl 1.4.6 since there is newer version sbcl 2.3.0? ./fricas --version FriCAS 2023-06-17 based on sbcl 1.4.16 >
>fricas --version FriCAS 1.3.8 based on sbcl 2.3.0 > Does it make any difference for performance? I assume the final version of Fricas 1.3.9 will be in source code and one can build it with more up to date sbcl, like one can do now with 1.3.8? I will do a quick test on this newer version of Fricas and compare results with 1.3.8 on the first 12 files in CAS integration tests and see if there is any regression. --Nasser On Saturday, June 24, 2023 at 1:07:03 PM UTC-5 Waldek Hebisch wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 03:28:27AM +0200, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 08:33:16AM +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > > > An update to my attempt to build hsbcl on top of sbcl 1.1.1. > > > I use the binary sbcl 1.1.1 from sourceforge.net. > > > > Indeed, there are problems. I am looking at possible alternatives > > and workarounds. > > I am trying to use sbcl-1.4.6. ATM it seems that it works. > However, since the process uses different, newer environment > (Gentoo) there are possible glitches. I have now put test > tarball at > > http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~hebisch/fricas/fricas-1.3.9-pre.amd64.tar.bz2 > > Actual release may contain more bug fixes and certainly there will > be update to documentation. This is mostly to verify that > binary works. In particular hunchentoot is included, so it > should work with jfricas. > > -- > Waldek Hebisch > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/fricas-devel/cede91c3-453b-43e0-b18d-e73e3df11d80n%40googlegroups.com.
