I have put down a deposit on a Slate, electric pickup available in late 2026; 
even though I am less than sanguine about the charging availability in the 
future. When I was in Amsterdam, pre-pandemic, the City would put a charging 
station in front of any home or apartment where a tenant/owner purchased an 
electric vehicle.

I would agree as to the inevitability of a collapse but, perhaps, less 
optimistic as to how far "back in time" we will find ourselves. I am keeping 
close to hand my Whole Earth Catalogs and Mother Jones periodicals.

davew


On Sun, Jun 1, 2025, at 12:31 PM, Jochen Fromm wrote:
> Yes, good points. My wife and I drive an electric car because I believe it is 
> the future. On the small street in Berlin where I live there are 4 charging 
> stations now, 10 years ago there were none. European cities have a lot more 
> electric cars and electric buses compared to 10 years ago. In Paris for 
> example you only see electric buses which reduce noise and pollution a lot. 
> We still have a long way to go, though.
> 
> 
> It is clear that we have to start the transition to renewable energy and a 
> more sustainable economy *now* - and need to continue it where it has already 
> started - but for various reasons, including those you mentioned, it will 
> most likely not be possible for the 8 billion people on Earth. 
> 
> 
> Which means a collapse of civilization is no longer a bugaboo, an imaginary 
> object of fear, and it becomes increasingly likely we are heading towards a 
> collapse of civilization and a destruction of our ecosystems (either through 
> climate change, and insurmountable piles of nuclear and plastic waste, or by 
> a long period of wars, or by natural disasters). There are many reasons why 
> civilizations collapse. 
> 
> https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300259285/amongst-the-ruins/
> 
> 
> Those who survive the collapse will need to find a more sustainable way to 
> live. The only way forward which does not destroy the ecosystems we live in 
> is to
> 
> + use renewable energy
> 
> + avoid burning fossil-fuels
> 
> + eliminate waste by recycling
> 
> + stop consuming non-renewable resources 
> 
> + stop production of nuclear waste
> 
> + stop population growth
> 
> 
> In others words we need to respect the axioms of sustainability if we do not 
> want to destroy the planet we live on
> 
> https://www.resilience.org/stories/2007-02-05/five-axioms-sustainability/
> 
> 
> 
> -J.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Prof David West <[email protected]>
> Date: 6/1/25 5:28 PM (GMT+01:00)
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Limits to Growth
> 
> Unfortunately, it is almost certain that there will never be enough 'fossil 
> fuel free power stations' to supply needed energy for electric vehicles.
> 
> Data centers, driven in large part by AI demands and cryptocurrency will 
> leave nothing left over.
> 
> Some numbers:
> 
> Three Mile Island, which is being recommissioned to supply  power to a couple 
> of Microsoft Data Centers, has a capacity of 7 Terawatt hours(T/w/h) per year.
> 
> In 2022 data centers, globally, consumed 460 TWh, by 2026 this is estimated 
> to be  1,000 Twh. By 2040 projected demand is 2,000-3,000 TWh.
> 
> Crypto adds 100-150 TWh in 2022, 200-300 in 2030, and 400-600 in 2040.
> 
> Nuclear is unlikely to provide more than 25% of this demand.
> 
> Between now and 2040, it will be necessary to build 100 TMI-capacity nuclear 
> plants to supply that 25%.
> 
> If solar is to supply the other 75%, it will require between 66,000 and 
> 80,000 square miles of solar panels. (Don't know how many batteries, but the 
> number is not trivial.)
> 
> Wind power, for that 75%, will require 153,000 to 214,000 turbines, each 
> requiring 50-60 acres of space beneath them. (Also the problem of batteries.)
> 
> It takes 10-15 years to build a nuclear plant like TMI, have no idea now many 
> dollars.
> 
> Neither solar nor wind, nor combined, can be installed fast enough to meet 
> this demand and, again, have no idea of cost.
> 
> Nothing left over for cars, the lights in your home and office, or to charge 
> your phone: unless, of course we continue to rely on oil (shale and 
> fracking), natural gas, and coal.
> 
> davew
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2025, at 6:24 AM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
>> This is why I’m so excited about electric vehicles—I feel like a kid waiting 
>> for Christmas! Add clean fossil fuel free power stations into the mix, and 
>> voilà: abundant clean energy, no miracle inventions required. Just some 
>> clever tech and a whole lot of charging cables!
>> 
>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2025 at 12:57, Jochen Fromm <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I believe we all have a slighty distorted view because we were all born 
>>> long after industrialization has started and have seen nothing but growth. 
>>> Industrialization started around 200 years ago in Great Britain and spread 
>>> shortly after to America and Europe. First by exploiting coal and steam 
>>> engines, later by oil and petrol engines. Tanks, warplanes, warships as 
>>> well as normal cars, planes and ships all consume oil.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Richard Heinberg writes in his book "The End of Growth": "with the fossil 
>>> fuel revolution of the past century and a half, we have seen economic 
>>> growth at a speed and scale unprecedented in all of human history. We 
>>> harnessed the energies of coal, oil, and natural gas to build and operate 
>>> cars, trucks, highways, airports, airplanes, and electric grids - all the 
>>> esential features of modern industrial society. Through the one-time-only 
>>> process of extracting and burning hundreds of millions of years worth of 
>>> chemically stored sunlight, we built what appeared (for a brief, shining 
>>> moment) to be a perpetual-growth machine. We learned to take what was in 
>>> fact an extraordinary situation for granted. It became normal [...] During 
>>> the past 150 years, expanding access to cheap and abundar fossil fuels 
>>> enabled rapid economic expansion at an average rate of about three percent 
>>> per year; economic planners began to take this situain for granted. 
>>> Financial systems internalized the expectation of growth as a promise of 
>>> returns on investments."
>>> 
>>> https://richardheinberg.com/bookshelf/the-end-of-growth-book
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Heinberg argues the time of cheap and abundant fossil fuels has come to an 
>>> end. There 1.5 billion cars in the world which consume oil and produce CO2. 
>>> Resources are depleted while pollution and population have reached all time 
>>> highs. It is true that humans are innovative and ingenious, especially in 
>>> times of scarcity, necessity and need, and we are able to find replacements 
>>> for depleted resources, but Heinberg argues in his book "Peak Everything: 
>>> that "in a finite world, the number of possible replacements is also 
>>> finite". For example we were able to replace the whale oil by petroleum, 
>>> but finding a replacement for petroleum is much harder.
>>> 
>>> https://richardheinberg.com/bookshelf/peak-everything
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Without oil no army would move, traffic would cease, no container or cruise 
>>> ship would be able to go anywhere and therefore international trade and 
>>> tourism would stop. On the bright side no more plastic and CO2 pollution 
>>> either. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> In his book "End of Growth" Heinberg mentions "transition towns" as a path 
>>> towards a more sustainable society and an economy which is not based on 
>>> fossil-fuels.
>>> 
>>> https://donellameadows.org/archives/rob-hopkins-my-town-in-transition/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> French author Victor Hugo wrote 200 years ago that "the paradise of the 
>>> rich is made out of the hell of the poor". If rich people start to realize 
>>> this and help to find a way to a more sustainable, livable society it would 
>>> be a start.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -J.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Pieter Steenekamp <[email protected]>
>>> Date: 5/31/25 5:46 AM (GMT+01:00)
>>> To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Limits to Growth
>>> 
>>> I’ve always loved the Simon-Ehrlich bet story—two clever guys betting on 
>>> the future of the planet. Ehrlich lost the bet, but the debate still runs 
>>> circles today.
>>> 
>>> https://ourworldindata.org/simon-ehrlich-bet
>>> 
>>> This article nails it: over the long term, prices mostly go down, not up, 
>>> as innovation kicks in. We don’t "run out" of resources—we get better at 
>>> using them. Scarcity shifts, but human creativity shifts faster.
>>> 
>>> The Limits to Growth folks had good intentions, but the real limit seems to 
>>> be how fast we can adapt and rethink. And so far, we’re doing okay—messy, 
>>> uneven, but okay.
>>> 
>>> Turns out, betting against human ingenuity is the real risky business.
>>> 
>>> On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 21:51, steve smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> __
>>>> REC -
>>>> 
>>>> Very timely...  I did a deep dive/revisit (also met the seminal work in 
>>>> college in the 70s) into Limits to Growth and World3 before the Stockholm 
>>>> workshop on Climate (and other existential threats) Complexity Merle 
>>>> wrangled in 2019....  and was both impressed and disappointed.   Rockstrom 
>>>> and folks were located right across the water from us where we met but to 
>>>> my knowledge didn't engage... their work was very complementary but did 
>>>> not feel as relevant to me then as it does now.
>>>> 
>>>> In the following interview, I felt he began to address many of the things 
>>>> I (previously) felt were lacking in their framework previoiusly.  It was 
>>>> there all the time I'm sure, I just didn't see it and I think they were 
>>>> not ready to talk as broadly of implications 5 years ago as they are now?
>>>> 
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6_3mOgvrN4
>>>>> 
>>>> Did anyone notice the swiss village inundated by debris and meltwater from 
>>>> the glacier collapse uphill?   Signs of the times or "business as usual"?
>>>> 
>>>> - SAS
>>>> 
>>>> On 5/30/25 12:16 PM, Roger Critchlow wrote:
>>>>> https://thenextwavefutures.wordpress.com/2025/05/20/limits-to-growth-was-right-about-overshoot-and-collapse-new-data/
>>>>> 
>>>>> I remember the Limits to Growth from my freshman year in college.  Now 
>>>>> Hackernews links to the above in which some people argue that we've 
>>>>> achieved the predicted overshoot for the business as usual scenario and 
>>>>> the subsequent collapse begins now.  Enjoy the peak of human 
>>>>> technological development.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- rec --
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / 
>>>>> ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
>>>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>>>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
>>>>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>>>> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>>>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>>>> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
>>>>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>>>>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>>> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / 
>>>> ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
>>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
>>>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>>> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>>> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
>>>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>>>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>>> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / 
>>> ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
>>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>>> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>>> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
>>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / 
>> ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
>> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
>> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
>> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>> 
> 
> .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
> --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
> 
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to