Marcus is correct, but also wrong.

Judges should not make scientific decisions. Challengers to rules, often large 
corporations with an intense desire to pollute or commit other social harm, 
should not either. Nor, should agency "scientists" whose decisions are seldom 
more than "because I said so."

Fortunately none of the above needs to be operative. The most lucrative job I 
ever held was "Referee" in a court case in Minnesota. (Referees in other 
jurisdictions are often called special masters.) The case involved software: a 
company wanting to move to a new vendor and the former vendor demanding a huge 
ransom ($1,000,000 in 1998) to decrypt the clients database so the new vendor 
could use it. My job as referee was to decide the 'science'; e.g., what was and 
was not possible by programming and what market rate would be for creating such 
a program. The judge decided the law.

To be a referee, it was imperative that I have no ties to either side in the 
dispute (e.g., no past or future consulting). I was paid the same rate as the 
lead attorneys on the two sides—$300/hour. Both sides insisted on hearings and 
depositions and submitting voluminous evidence. So, what could have been 
decided in less than an hour (time to read a description of the two sides and 
see the obvious) ended up in 145 billable hours. 

The referee/special master model has been around for a long long time and 
should be used. And, you should see both the law and decisions be somewhat 
fluid over time to reflect the evolving nature of science. Something that would 
never happen with Chevron intact.

davew


On Tue, Aug 27, 2024, at 11:46 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Dave writes:
>
> < Before Chevron was overturned, those same agencies determination of 
> "science" behind those rules could not be challenged. >
>
> Good -- the justices aren't scientists.   The mechanism of change should be 
> through scientific debate, not legal debate.
>
> Marcus
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present 
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
> Attachments:
> * smime.p7s

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to