I am coming late to this thread/discussion which is probably for the best, not diving in prematurely.

I appreciate your (NST) bringing the thread back to your original question, not that the myriad braided channels of the thread are not useful and interesting.

I think it is an interesting question for many reasons.

1. What makes 2040 Auspicious to you (or any of us?)
2. What scope (geographic, political, social, specieal) of community?
3. Where does scaling come in (referencing 1 and 2)?

2040...  I'm used to people invoking 2030 and 2050 and 2100 variously... I don't think I've encountered a 2040 invocation before.  It is auspcious for me in that I will be mid-80s by then which may be the age of some of our eldest here already, and an age which I don't necessarily expect to reach personally.  My father and grandfathers only made it into their late 70s and early 80s(my father) while my mother recently passed just shy of 91.

Many Climate Predictors/Planners are talking about not getting our carbon gluttony under control before 2050, others are saying 2030 is a critical goal and yet other say we are already farooked and now it is deck-chair-on-titanic time.   I suppose I believe all of them.   We missed a window in 1900 or maybe 1975 or maybe 2000 for nipping our gluttony for portable, inexpensive, ubiquitous, very dense energy in the bud, and the worst of the greenhouse gas-induced climato-ecological tumble that is finally becoming something many people experience in real time.   It took ME getting a bad sunburn at sea-level in 10 minutes (in NZ in 2000) to actually *believe* in the Ozone hole (as it shrunk but precessed around the south pole, making sun-exposure MUCH more acute (fickle) than I've been used to living in dry, high elevation conditions most of my life).   Los Alamos tried to burn down *twice* in 10 years and I, along with many others tried to treat it as a transient/coincidental phenomena, not a consequence of widespread heat/drought/etc.   Now cities like Portland and Denver (where my daughters each live) are trying to burn down. As little as 2 years ago I remember a discussion on this list where at least one member seemed adamant that a 2C rise in average temperature of the globe was nothing to worry about.  That member (and others who lurk on such topics) may well still hold that the wild and growing variations in weather, forced by a small but meaningful climate shift, is not a problem and/or is also nothing we have brought upon ourselves with our ignorantly willful gluttony (which I have shared in my life, and continue to experience albeit somewhat reduced).

Scope of Community...  I think your original question was pretty much using the vernacular use of "community"...   me and all my friends, associates, neighbors, colleagues, etc.   How do we live together.   What does a "day in the life" look like?   I think this is a good choice of focus/question even though (or especially because) it is the tip of the iceberg of what is important/relevant.   It IS what we experience.  It is (for the most part) our fitness function, which we optimize for.   I ask scope because of the intertwinedness of Economy, Ecology, and ???   earth/human systems which I think we have somewhat ignored.   We here are practiced and trained somewhat in systems thinking but I would claim that we are not that good at it, at least not outside of our specialized domains where we have peers and tools and systems to keep us honest.   Huge failings of this type range from the manic hypercapitalistic modality that does not recognize that it *can* shit it's own nest with both earth-systems (ecology) and human systems (economic class/warfare), to the current pandemic (best I can tell anti-mask/anti-vaxx folks are thinking only/at-best about infectous disease and entirely oblivious of epidemiology and how it is different if related).   I also believe that the anti-democracy activities afoot around the world are predicated on something like a majority (or at least a large enough mob) believing that as long as they are the ones getting their way, there really isn't any value in a system that supports something like fairness/justice/plurality.   I myself have a lot of misgivings about direct and representative democracy, but not (just) because I keep not-getting-my-way in the one I ostensibly inhabit, but because I don't think it either optimizes nor satisfices what we *really want/need* which is part of Nick's original challenge (healthy community).   In my emergent pan-consciousness perspective, I accept the technical accuracy of Marcus' position about "natural consequences"...  but I also continue to hold onto principals of mutual respect (and even love) among/between loci of consciousness (individual humans, other sentient creatures, not-quite-sentient creatures, trees, forests, mountains, glaciers, ice-caps, etc.)

Scaling...   this thread has included discussions (dismissals?) of "intermediate scale" in our systems, yet most of us are familiar with the emergence/maintenance of power-law distributions in natural systems.   Engineering (including of Societies and Economies) tends to focus on (false?) efficiencies which tend to (require?) eliminate or at least severely reduce intermediate scales.  "Cut out the middleman".   I find the specifics of Nudge Theory a little bit trite but I do very much appreciate the attempt to re-introduce some of the mechanisms of natural/evolutionary systems into our engineering processes. "Nudging" very likely re-introduces some of the intermediate scale structures that hyper-optimization of sub-dimensional fitness-functions tend to eliminate.   "Think Global, Act Local" seems to have become at least dated if not somewhat deprecated... and it certainly can seem trite.   I take it to be a bumper-sticker sized, generally accessible proxy for "power law distribution of scales".

- Steve

On 1/3/22 10:28 AM, thompnicks...@gmail.com wrote:

Marcus and EricS,

I am uncertain about the degree to which your answers deny the premise of my question: What does a healthy 2040 COMMUNITY look like.  Marcus seems committed to a naturalist morality, all natural selection is good, but I can’t believe that Eric is, given other things he has said in these pages.  The citation of the aphorism,

“The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.”

…suggests a hankering to out think the market, to head off the future, not just to plan to profit form it, but perhaps I am inserting my own Silent Generation Deweyan hankering.

It’s freezing effing cold in this room and I have to go to the sunny side of the house.

Nick Thompson

thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>

https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/ <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/>

*From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *David Eric Smith
*Sent:* Monday, January 3, 2022 5:15 AM
*To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
*Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Roger Mcnamee !!??

This is an interesting direction.

How small a minority does one have to be in, for it to count as an arbitrage opportunity?  In the El Farol and Minority Game abstractions, any minority is enough.

If we think about the dichotomy in public health, or in reason vs. hormonal aggression, the split in the US (at least by political commitments) is not so far from 50/50.  But as far as “profiting from the committed wrong”, that market seems to be cornered already by a very tiny percent, who have priced in much of the available surplus.  The difference between the dupes and the honest but powerless seems unimportant compared to the difference between both of those and the insiders with power, access, and control.  Somehow these richly structured extensive-form games with coalitional solution concepts seem very far from the market model in which we often think about arbitrage.

I am also reminded of the aphorism in that other realm “The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.”  Or in the case of climate, agricultural, and social instability, alive.

I wonder what makes an adequate toolbox of concepts and analogies with which to think about this (at least somewhat) systematically.

Eric



    On Jan 2, 2022, at 2:58 PM, Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com>
    wrote:

    Nick writes:

    < So, what does a healthy 2040 community look like.  What are we
    working TOWARD, here.  Once of the things that the Mcnamee podcast
    highlighted for me was my feeling that, in a chaotic world, people
    like me, /planners, /are just out of tune with the world. >

    I don't think it really matters how people interact in social
    media or what they think.   What will matter is how people adapt
    to climate change and the exhaustion of food and energy, and the
    migrations resulting from climate change.  That's where the
    opportunities will be.   If there are millions of people that deny
    it is happening like they deny pandemics, then things simply must
    be arranged so that the natural accounting occurs.  The planners
    will look past the chaos and make their investments.. and wait.

    Marcus

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:*Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com
    <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> on behalf
    ofthompnicks...@gmail.com
    <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com><thompnicks...@gmail.com
    <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>>
    *Sent:*Sunday, January 2, 2022 1:32 PM
    *To:*'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
    <friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
    *Subject:*Re: [FRIAM] Roger Mcnamee !!??

    So, what does a healthy 2040 community look like.   What are we
    working TOWARD, here.  Once of the things that the Mcnamee podcast
    highlighted for me was my feeling that, in a chaotic world, people
    like me,/planners,/are just out of tune with the world.

    By the way, I think “surfing the web” , as it has been used, is a
    terrible metaphor.  What most of us do is like water skiing the
    web.  Bouncing over the wake, never actually getting into the
    water.   Gives surfing a bad name.  A surfer finds the few
    survivable paths through an immense concentration of hostile
    forces.  Surfing is more like martial arts.  In fact we must begin
    to surf the web. To realize the manners in which its hostile
    forces constrain us and find the few paths that allow us to master
    those forces and come out of the curl safely.  We thought it was a
    playground; now we see it’s a minefield.

    n

    Nick Thompson

    thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>

    https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwordpress.clarku.edu%2fnthompson%2f&c=E,1,-Fd2M0MU4wX5y1N6mhhnNrFlsG64cdcJ8jOErlxB0hvFzR4dcEnKSSt2EqX5s2fb-wPOBqSH4X2Ap1mYP24zv3_muYGYijRLpnFKTxxN3dQyGtSp1B6x&typo=1>

    *From:*Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com
    <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>>*On Behalf Of*Marcus Daniels
    *Sent:*Sunday, January 2, 2022 2:18 PM
    *To:*The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
    <friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
    *Subject:*Re: [FRIAM] Roger Mcnamee !!??

    Nick writes:

    < Imagined a world in which we all worked at home, everything was
    on zoom, and everything was delivered by Amazon by drone.  I
    realize this is a reductio, but hum along with me for a few bars. 
    There would be no intermediate social landscape between the home
    and the distribution center.  No intermediate human scales.

    I can’t say immediately why this would be a bad thing, but my gut
    doesn’t like it.>

    I can't think of many examples where the intermediate scales are
    anything but wasteful or intrusive.   Maybe to see a tailor
    coupled to the purchase of certain clothes?  I still drive to
    services (dentist, doctor, hair stylist), just not to
    redistributors, because they don't really add anything.   There's
    still a farmer's market that seems as popular as ever -- but they
    DO offer something unique.    I can drive five minutes to Home
    Depot but honestly half the time their inventory is exhausted for
    what I want, and I end up ordering it online.

    Marcus

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:*Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com
    <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> on behalf
    ofthompnicks...@gmail.com
    <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com><thompnicks...@gmail.com
    <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>>
    *Sent:*Sunday, January 2, 2022 1:03 PM
    *To:*'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
    <friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
    *Subject:*Re: [FRIAM] Roger Mcnamee !!??

    Marcus,

    I would like to be convinced …. But

    Imagined a world in which we all worked at home, everything was on
    zoom, and everything was delivered by Amazon by drone.  I realize
    this is a reductio, but hum along with me for a few bars.  There
    would be no intermediate social landscape between the home and the
    distribution center.  No intermediate human scales.

    I can’t say immediately why this would be a bad thing, but my gut
    doesn’t like it.

    Nick

    Nick Thompson

    thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>

    https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwordpress.clarku.edu%2fnthompson%2f&c=E,1,p4rsPfl7qCnkvPDXzYT5M-1fZBZKaCDIB1z2Osc-CfFDLgw598S0mD13_Sppk4ua_2uMIZVWNAECmtZ8s2kblHg2quJex4YawfboMGbRTDU_u15bu8836eLAHQ,,&typo=1>

    *From:*Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com
    <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>>*On Behalf Of*Marcus Daniels
    *Sent:*Sunday, January 2, 2022 1:38 PM
    *To:*'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
    <friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
    *Subject:*Re: [FRIAM] Roger Mcnamee !!??

    I can see living without Facebook (I do), but why can't we live
    with Amazon?   It seems like they did a pretty good job of
    displacing the likes of Walmart.  It could happen again.  What
    added inherent value do stores have, other than as a mechanism to
    prevent he consolidation of market influence w.r.t. to prices?

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *From:*Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com
    <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> on behalf
    ofthompnicks...@gmail.com
    <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com><thompnicks...@gmail.com
    <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>>
    *Sent:*Sunday, January 2, 2022 12:03 PM
    *To:*'The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group'
    <friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
    *Subject:*[FRIAM] Roger Mcnamee !!??

    I just listened to this podcast

    https://feeds.megaphone.fm/VMP5489734702
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2ffeeds.megaphone.fm%2fVMP5489734702&c=E,1,G87ToIzgI5DT4ZpiKuXcRc2EHcS4lpVgIftU98yiNor7PFNa9lCoDMtpA2GT4_2eudXeeatF6BgR-Peqwvf8pBQOnsbOiuYBI693rGSZCjDA8-JbvEUZ&typo=1>

    a conversation between the former prosecutor, Joyce Vance, and the
    musician, financier, turncoat Facebook investor Roger Mcnamee, who
    likens this moment with big tech to the moment before the food
    industry regulations of the early 1900’s and anti-pollution
    legislation of the 60’s, moments when Da People reasserted control
    over over-weening industry interests.  He is author of the
    book,/Zucked/.

    An hour-long pod cast is a terribly inefficient way to learn about
    something, so I hope that one you, for whom none of this is news,
    can offer a more condensed source.

    We are basically talking about the Amazon paradox, here: can’t
    live with it; can’t live without it.  How much ARE we willing to
    pay to have the trains run on time?

    As usual, I am in need of instruction.

    Nick Thompson

    thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>

    https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwordpress.clarku.edu%2fnthompson%2f&c=E,1,AekdfP2MBl31iUxGjknOMPY6CLKTWZ0Uy_4dTUwGKgNke6kg7BN0qwu3VC8xzay12y6vtDYGszhL0ussBgpgtjOzZjJu9AWkUutwzgaFOibLSYQ0DDICSZg,&typo=1>


    .-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..-
    --. .- - .
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6
    
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2f%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,6c1hDw-I-XHC_ZStkZsXiT2ShUHKgKly7CIaoYaCXWbVgznocfGx2rmiRYUezbHgbt6ooqJZjG8eRVXMk1IVZdexrkjgabs_-b7egl28XAJYXIPcK5WsdpAa&typo=1
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2f%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,6c1hDw-I-XHC_ZStkZsXiT2ShUHKgKly7CIaoYaCXWbVgznocfGx2rmiRYUezbHgbt6ooqJZjG8eRVXMk1IVZdexrkjgabs_-b7egl28XAJYXIPcK5WsdpAa&typo=1>
    
un/subscribehttps://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,aJQPCieL8dRJ8bByCIGF9grQLNknzJ308mdn7E9wsFmtU2l-QVA1WoQujdxb6FrTTWWLrFtB-RZADkeeKsqVBKf7gzoqV8LeNcWJ4OKpRxRZ6whmow,,&typo=1
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,aJQPCieL8dRJ8bByCIGF9grQLNknzJ308mdn7E9wsFmtU2l-QVA1WoQujdxb6FrTTWWLrFtB-RZADkeeKsqVBKf7gzoqV8LeNcWJ4OKpRxRZ6whmow,,&typo=1>
    
FRIAM-COMIChttps://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,iIbsCSTfK7m1DvfK0eZuO3EHFPbO0h8MXp_Bw4kXa5txdNsy81PKEL5K4lU5D-1SQ5bklvskz4EwfKUtkDntcjPY3rHFMVLVC3JUg3vjCw29DjAS1o5UY0nh5A,,&typo=1
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,iIbsCSTfK7m1DvfK0eZuO3EHFPbO0h8MXp_Bw4kXa5txdNsy81PKEL5K4lU5D-1SQ5bklvskz4EwfKUtkDntcjPY3rHFMVLVC3JUg3vjCw29DjAS1o5UY0nh5A,,&typo=1>
    archives:
    5/2017 thru
    
presenthttps://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,p64yCHvaJEFX77QqASShCNx2e3TMxvwUnzpsO1C3vTN777PRrnbS8P8W95aCa4XCzK-GE3Rdk4juvBCojdTXlPqDLV345Lz4zzRev4WoBAfALZKaFR0aHUBEqj8,&typo=1
    
<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,p64yCHvaJEFX77QqASShCNx2e3TMxvwUnzpsO1C3vTN777PRrnbS8P8W95aCa4XCzK-GE3Rdk4juvBCojdTXlPqDLV345Lz4zzRev4WoBAfALZKaFR0aHUBEqj8,&typo=1>
    1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
    <http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/>


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to