Glen, 

All observations are myopic.  All observations are from a point of view.  All 
propositions are three-valued.  So, what is this universal point of view from 
which you hold my observations to be myopic?  Eh?   Even back on my meds I can 
see that there is something wrong with that. 

n

Nick Thompson
thompnicks...@gmail.com
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

-----Original Message-----
From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of ? glen
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2021 5:31 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] the cancellation arc

Both EricC's and Marcus' responses say what I'm about to say, but in different 
language.

There is no such thing as 'epiphenomena'. When you see something you *think* is 
epi, it means you've imputed your preconceived function. It's myopic preemptive 
registration.



On September 15, 2021 8:24:49 PM PDT, thompnicks...@gmail.com wrote:
>Hi, everyone [who is still following this thread].  
>
> 
>
>Before I go back on my meds, I just thought I would send along this link 
><https://www.huffpost.com/entry/compass-pleasure_b_890342> .  I should perhaps 
>be embarrassed at sending a HuffPost link, but the summary of the old 
>Olds/Milner research seems accurate enough and it is very succinct.   On my 
>account we have been talking all along about the epiphenomenal relation and in 
>particular, that version of it which relates goals to functions.  Functions 
>are epiphenomenal with respect to the goals that serve them.  The function of 
>a pleasure (ie, a goal system) is to get us to do stuff that urgently needs 
>doing.  What happens when we access the goal system directly and make it 
>possible to do essentially nothing and achieve the goal?   Dave says, having 
>learned what it had to teach him, he would put the device on a shelf.  But how 
>would he do that and WHY would he do that?  What other goal-pleasure would be 
>sufficient to mobilize and direct him in the putting of the device on the 
>shelf.  
>
> 
>
>Ok.  Best be done for a bit.  Let’ see.  One tablet a day by mouth.  Sorry to 
>bother you all.  I do learn a lot from these exercises, even if nobody else 
>does.  And then later I write something good, and that pleases me.  
>
>
-- 
glen ⛧


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to