That's just nonsense. By the time you're at the ER, the vaccine is largely 
irrelevant. Plus, when some 18 year old kid comes in unconscious with a gunshot 
wound, it's difficult to ask her if she's been vaccinated or not.

Anyway, most large hospitals are under a mandate to treat whoever walks in the 
door, even if they don't have insurance. To make the change you suggest would 
require major legislative effort and, perhaps, re-architect the laws that 
govern public medicine. You're not gonna do that anytime soon.

Taking a look at this site: 
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/12/09/944379919/new-data-reveal-which-hospitals-are-dangerously-full-is-yours
it seems the ratio of covid patients is actually lower than I thought. The 
actual problem is insufficient buffer capacity, not the surge in covid 
patients. The covid patients are simply demonstrating the problem.


On 8/25/21 9:58 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Will you consent to a vaccine?  
> 
> Yes:  You get treatment for your non-COVID condition.  No:  Get lost.  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 9:53 AM
> To: friam@redfish.com
> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] On the: RLY!? side
> 
> Because the majority of the patients in the ERs are not covid patients. (Last 
> I heard the percentages were around 60-70% are non-covid. But I'm sure it's 
> location dependent.) They're regular people with regular problems, many of 
> whom delayed medical treatments for a year due to lockdowns. We did a little 
> too much "just in time" logistical planning with our hospitals and this 
> fairly tiny bump is demonstrating that our buffer wasn't high enough.
> 
> The smart thing to do is increase capacity, correct the buffer size, and take 
> care of both covid patients and regular people.
> 
> 
> On 8/25/21 9:33 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>> Why should we increase the capacity of the hospitals?  Just don't let them 
>> in.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of u?l? ?>$
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2021 9:25 AM
>> To: friam@redfish.com
>> Subject: Re: [FRIAM] On the: RLY!? side
>>
>> Well, only if you don't make a big stink out of it. If it's a normal, 
>> everyday thing, yeah sure. But if it's some litmus test for who's with us or 
>> who's against us, then they're much less willing to submit to such tests.
>>
>> You see this in spades w.r.t. to the protests. In Portland, they antifa are 
>> rigorous about staging counter protests, which makes the fascists dig in and 
>> be more committed to protesting, which makes the antifa more committed, ad 
>> infinitum. Here in Olympia, it's mostly just the fascists out there 
>> protesting mask and vaccine mandates. (Yes, irony is dead.) But as a result, 
>> they're anticlimactic and peter out pretty comfortably.
>>
>> Along the same lines of "don't feed the troll", if we focused our attention 
>> on increasing the capacities of hospitals rather than brow beating the 
>> anti-vaxers, I suspect the vax rate would climb steadily and the reactionary 
>> tendencies of the anti-vaxers would abate.
>>
>>
>> On 8/25/21 9:09 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
>>> These same people are willing to submit to an employer's drug tests.


-- 
☤>$ uǝlƃ

- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/

Reply via email to