As badly as I might do so, it's my goal to fit to the best evidence available, to be well-coupled to the environment ... at least the parts of the environment I'm capable of seeing and responding to. So, if I am the same while working at a dot-com in CA as I am working for myself in WA, then *something* must be wrong. Of course, EricC might make the argument that dot-com life in CA is overwhelmingly similar to self-employment in WA (at least compared to, say, goat herding in Turkey or potato farming on Mars). But I don't buy it. If you behave the same way when, say, drinking 40s with your homies, as you do when, say, interviewing for a job at McKinsey & Co, then you're probably not doing it right.
On 2/10/21 10:40 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Perhaps he, like me, relies on your consistent inconsistency. > > Is it your goal to be inconsistently inconsistent? -- ↙↙↙ uǝlƃ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
