It seems that it would be good to get the MMWR or Mortality and Morbidity
Weekly Report.

Highly regarded by epidemiologists according to one of the experts on CNN.

---
Frank C. Wimberly
140 Calle Ojo Feliz,
Santa Fe, NM 87505

505 670-9918
Santa Fe, NM

On Sat, Sep 12, 2020, 4:17 PM Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> Without picking directly on Dave, or using him as a proxy for or maybe
> just a whipping boy for the folks who continue to imagine that having
> Donald Trump and his gang of openly sycophantic and corrupt supporters
> in his cabinet and in Congress is actually a *healthy* thing for this
> country, I think the question of whether humans in general and US
> Citizens at this time, are capable of anything outside of an A)
> Mobocracy; or B) Oligarchy thinly disguised as a Representative
> Democracy.
>
> I've been guilty of being a very poor voter-citizen by one standard or
> another and order 1/3 or more of my fellow citizens probably have a
> story where I am a total moron/idiot because I don't agree with one or
> more of their trigger-issues.
>
> And talk about persuasion/governance-by-fear:   As a registered DTR
> (declines to respond == independent) voter I've been getting a barrage
> of nasty garbage mail about the presidential election from the
> Republican Party of New Mexico...  maybe they don't waste the postage on
> registered Democrats?  Mary doesn't get these.    You can imagine the
> crap they insert into their imagery and verbage, but  if I didn't have
> any other source of information (or more to the point, primary evidence
> of Biden and his allies' record and public demeanor), I'd think he (and
> they) are everything just short of child molesters who are in the
> streets themselves beating up cops with their own night-sticks, and that
> the fires in Oregon are being started by them personally in Portland and
> blowing the embers out into the forests (that Republicans would rake
> into safety if Democrats would let them).  The photos are perspective
> foreshortened and blue caste to make you feel like the figures shown
> (e.g. Biden, Bernie, Kamala, AOC) are vampires looming over you the way
> Trump stalked and loomed over Clinton at the debates.
>
> I don't know *any* Republicans who are afraid of COVID... well... except
> for my hypochondriac sister and family who seem to have slowly come
> around to have a perspective that aligns pretty well with that of the
> Dems, yet very well may still help (try to) Vote Donald and his cronies
> right back into power (just because?).   Sturgis the community was only
> 60% against holding the annual HD/Trump rally there and only about
> 10-20% of the usual attendees declined this year.   That doesn't sound
> like fear to me.   I don't hear Biden's campaign chanting "Lock them
> up!" even though it seems likely that The entire Trump family , his
> staff (present and deprecated) and some of his cabinet might well be
> subject to criminal charges without the current obfuscation,
> misdirection, and direct obstruction the (implied/implicit?) power of
> the office of the President seems to allow for, hiding the evidence.
>
> I *do* think that a solid 51% up to 60% of the population *are* very
> scared at the quality and quantity of damage to the "America" he
> promised to make "Great Again" if he gets another 4 years...   The
> Trumpsters like to throw out "Trump Derangement Syndrome" left and right
> (and Left and Right) in the attempt to characterize anyone who is
> offended by anything (much less everything) Trump does.
>
> My enemy's enemies are not my friends, but it IS heartening to see the
> significant backlash against Trumpism by many non-liberal, non-Democrat
> factions.   The Lincoln Project might be the most well
> organized/funded.   THEY are throwing fear and loathing at Trump... and
> I"m sure plenty of LIberals/Democrats love seeing that... and I suppose
> I'm just glad I don't have to get my own hands dirty (possibly?)
> overstating Trumps outrageous behaviour.
>
> The next 2 months (and 2.5 beyond) will surely prove to be interesting...
>
> - Steve
>
> On 9/12/20 12:42 PM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> > When the populace won't tolerate this the populace won't get this.   But
> mostly people are morons.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Prof David West
> > Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 11:33 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] flu versus COVID
> >
> > Nothing in my post was intended to malign Fauci, nor attack his
> credibility. I did attempt to call him on a specific mistake (one he may
> have later corrected). He is not among the "powers that be."
> >
> > I totally stand by my accusation that "governance by fear" seems to have
> become the default for setting policy  — fear of pornography to justify
> repressive Web policies; fear of drugs to justify repressive regulation on
> use; fear of crime to justify militarization of police; fear of WMD to
> justify Iraq; fear of terror to justify TSA, fear of extinction to justify
> carbon regulation; fear of COVID to justify lock down.
> >
> > I have a real problem with this trend. One, it denigrates and devalues
> the populace as too dumb to understand the real issues, the messiness of
> incomplete but increasing knowledge, and the complexity and provisionality
> of solutions; two, any error, however minor, has the power to call into
> question the whole; and three it is ultimately self-defeating.
> >
> > davew
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020, at 10:42 AM, glen∉ℂ wrote:
> >> Never ascribe malice (or governance by fear) when incompetence will
> >> suffice. -- paraphrased from some pithy archetype somewhere sometime.
> >>
> >> I was totally with you until the last 2 paragraphs, though I haven't
> >> checked your facts. In my posts about "credibility", I tried to lay
> >> out the idea that someone like Fauci is NOT properly labeled
> >> [in]credible because of any single act/statement or even the truth
> >> status of one or several acts/statements. Credibility comes from
> >> consistent *care*, including revisiting things later and making
> >> attempts to abut or correct previous acts/statements.
> >>
> >> Fauci shows such care. Therefore, Fauci is credible, even if he's made
> mistakes.
> >>
> >> When you talk about ruling through fear, the real culprit is, as EricS
> >> pointed out, the political pressure on people like Fauci to render
> >> opinions *aligned* with some party line. To accuse Fauci of such in
> >> light of the recent news from Woodward's book and the pressure on CDC
> >> rank and file is disinformation. You're focus on the victim makes your
> >> post incredible disinformation, even if (or especially if) the first
> >> part of your post is factual. It's a typical abuse of facts to foster
> >> a false narrative.
> >>
> >> But it's also important to realize we're all, always, susceptible to
> >> such faulty reasoning. Attempts to be diligent and correct in such is
> >> the source of credibility. I was once accused of being a spammer
> >> because I posted too much, even though my accuser admitted the
> >> *content* of my posts were on topic and not spam, the very volume was
> >> offensive to him. This is yet another example of normal people's small
> >> appetite for verbosity. Pithiness, pseudo-profound bullshit, and false
> >> narratives are all aspects of the same beast. It's impossible to
> >> harden ourselves to such risk without holing up in our echo-chamber
> >> dungeons, surrounded by others who've "jumped over the bar" to be
> >> included in our in-group.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/12/20 7:44 AM, Prof David West wrote:
> >>> Sloppy reporting, and sloppy pronouncements — yes, you Dr. Fauci —
> have contaminated the discussion about COVID and appropriate responses.
> Specifically with regard equating or improperly substituting IFR with CFR.
> >>>
> >>> IFR = infection fatality rate
> >>> CFR = case fatality rate
> >>>
> >>> A "case"requires symptoms.
> >>>
> >>> Seasonal flu has an IFR of 0.1% and a CFR of 2-3%
> >>>
> >>> COVID has an IFR of 1.0% [initially WHO and CDC stated a higher
> >>> percent] and a CFR of 2-3%
> >>>
> >>> For whatever reason, Dr Fauci and other official statements have
> compared COVID's CFR to the flu's IFR to assert the "deadliness" of the
> disease and to justify draconian measures.
> >>>
> >>> Naysayers, compare CFR to CFR to assert that COVID is no more deadly
> than the flu. They are correct. With the "TRUTH" on their side, they rail
> against the lock down.
> >>>
> >>> There is a justification for social distancing and masks in the
> difference between IFR and IFR coupled with the higher infection rate of
> COVID and the flu( a lot of flu immunity exists), plus the "infectious
> phase" of 12 days (COVID) instead of 2 (flu).
> >>>
> >>> In my opinion the "powers that be" have such a low opinion of the
> average intelligence of the populace that they misrepresent the data in
> order to scare the crap out of people in order to get them to comply with
> directives instead of making the reasonable and correct, but more nuanced
> and complicated, factual argument for their policies.
> >>>
> >>> Governance by fear seems to be standard operating procedure these
> days. 9-11 yielded the TSA abomination (expensive, ineffective and
> annoying). Can't wait to see what COVID inflicts — especially with the talk
> of "forced vaccinations" I have heard bandied about.
> >>
> >> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> >> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn
> >> GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe
> >> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> >> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> >> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> >>
> > - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> > Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe
> http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> > archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> > - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> > Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> > un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> > archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> > FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
> un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
> FRIAM-COMIC <http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/FRIAM-COMIC>
> http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
>
- .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ 

Reply via email to