Ha! Again, you contradict yourself. You've said repeatedly that you haven't gained the computational skills you thought you might gain by engaging with the complexity club. So, it's *not* easy for you, even if you claim it is.
I suppose we might say that, when first presented with a perspective/experience/talent that you don't (yet) have but you see another person has, then you might think "Hey, that doesn't look hard. I'll just practice." And I suspect some people do find affinities with such things... e.g. some people seem to pick up foreign languages easier than others. But then there's the *degree* of mastery. Sure, I can play 10 Little Indians on the keyboard. But I'll *never* have the experience of a really good piano player. If such things are easy for you, then congratulations! But I doubt you're telling the truth. 8^) I suspect you find such things just as hard as I do. On 5/1/20 2:03 PM, [email protected] wrote: > I agree that the problem is the same as the problem of working out what your > point of view would be from where you are standing. If that is a hard > problem for you, I trust your judgement, for the moment, until more evidence > is in, that its hard for you. However, it doesn’t seem hard for me, > although, if further evidence were presented to me, I might be convinced > otherwise. > > Do we agree on what sort of evidence would be required to convince you that > the problem is easy for you or me that the problem is hard for me? -- ☣ uǝlƃ .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ... FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
