On 5/1/20 8:41 AM, [email protected] wrote: > First, remember, a proper monist shouldn't talk about his "stuff",whatever it > is, as if it is distinguishable from other "stuff", because that is dualism, > full stop. So I really shouldn’t be doing this at all.
That's just nonsense. Even if there's 1 substance, it can take 2 forms. We can distinguish ice from water even though it's the same stuff. > */[NST===> [...] But putting aside w’s warning for a moment, let me just say > that I don’t think we have different kinds of comprehension here, but > comprehensions of different types of objects. <===nst] /* I disagree. I think we're talking about different *ways* of organizing the ambient muck ... i.e. different comprehensions. -- ☣ uǝlƃ .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ... FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
