"Automism" is a funky word.  But if it means something like knee-jerk reaction, 
then I get it.  The important question you ask evaluates negative, though.  No, 
nothing "is what it is however it comes to be."  This is an instance of the 
logical abstraction layer I've been mentioning (that has no traction, 
apparently).  To violently slice a thing out of its context and then assume 
that thing has some existence, reality, effect, etc. separate from its history, 
is just plain wrong.  At the very least, the speed with which the "automism" 
was programmed in, the extent to which it's tethered/bound to things outside 
it, and the speed with which it could be deprogrammed are all violated by the 
slicing out.

So, one of our cats died on Wednesday.  She went in for exploratory surgery to 
investigate a mass that was preventing food from moving from her stomach to her 
intestines.  It was a pyloric adenoma the surgeon saw no good way to fix.  So 
we killed her.  The important question is: To what extent did we destroy any 
happiness, good will, comfort, etc. by putting her through a 2 week process of 
changing her diet, forcing barium down her throat, poking her for blood draws, 
etc?  She was a super happy cat for ~5 years.  But her life ended in terror and 
pain (despite the relatively humane way we did things compared to what it could 
have been).

If, paraphrasing, she is what she is however she came to be, then she was a 
terrified and suffering animal and the 5 preceding years were entirely washed 
away by the 2 week ending.

On 1/16/19 5:06 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
> As a good friend, I would like to gently chide you for the implicit 
> assumption that a the assignment of any behavioral automism to a particular 
> physiological cause makes it more plausible as an automism.  It is what it is 
> however it comes to be, isn't it?   Could it not have been imprinted in the 
> few minutes after the puppies first opened their eyes and later transferred 
> from Mom to owner as part of a normal developmental process?  Either way, it 
> now is a behavioral automism, and like all behavior is the result of a 
> physiological machine operating in a physical environment.  

-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to