Russ -

I think your message got lost in the "uncanny valley"... the conversation has been so rich that this contribution (by the instigating author of the thread) did get lost to it's relative obviousness. I know *I* read through it and nodded my head but instead felt compelled to respond to SG's post which *was* (I think) in response to this.

I have suggested a new thread and this type of question (dual-worldness) would probably be central to it. I do hope others weigh in.

- Steve


On 5/28/17 1:58 PM, Russ Abbott wrote:
I'm wondering whether the message below got lost. Our did no one think it worth mentioning?

On May 28, 2017 6:35 PM, "Russ Abbott" <russ.abb...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.abb...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Greetings from Jerusalem! Quite an amazing city. Never been here
    before. Quite an amazing discussion too.

    My interest, I think, is not so much in defining what we (want to)
    mean by a complex system buy in exploring the implications of
    systems consisting of agents as described earlier. The ability to
    process symbols seems to me to make all the difference in the world.
    Physical entities capable of processing symbols seem to me to live
    it two worlds: the physical and the symbolic. (The original
    question was prompted by the notion that complexity requires that
    sort of dual worldness. But that's not my core concern. You can
    probably get pretty far wrt complexity in a world that includes
    switches, where by a switch I mean one energy flow that controls
    another, a light switch for example. So systems of multiple energy
    flows where one controls another like weather and geology are good
    candidates.)

    Symbolic processing, including computers, is a step beyond
    switches. Half a century ago Newell and Simon defined computers as
    physical symbol machines. We and many biological organisms are
    physical symbol machines also. I think that's an important way to
    look at it.

    The thing about physical symbol machines is that the rules of
    causation they follow are more complex than those of physics.

    That's enough rambling for now on my cell phone.

    On May 28, 2017 6:04 PM, "Stephen Guerin"
    <stephen.gue...@simtable.com <mailto:stephen.gue...@simtable.com>>
    wrote:

        Marcos writes;

            Depending on which J values are zero, there can one phase
            space or many independent phase spaces depending on how
many disconnected components there are.

        I agree with a small tweak.

        Yes, the subgraphs would have their own independent phase
        spaces (especially if topologies were dissimilar). Though, I
        would not call the independent subgraphs components as they
        are no longer part of a larger whole.  If the subgraphs are
        independent and not interacting you cease to have one
        system. You have multiple independent systems each with their
        own phase spaces.

        I'll wrap with my position:

          * I gave three examples of non-biological complex systems
            based on Russ's initial question
          * Russ's additional criteria later in the thread are similar
            to distinguishing criteria for complex living systems vs
            complex non-living systems. This is an area of research
            I'm fascinated with and I encourage this line of discussion
          * If I need to use Russ's criteria, I can't think of a
            non-biological example. To me it's like asking for a
            non-biological example of a living system.
          * I disagree with Russ's claim that all complex systems must
            satisfy his criteria to be a complex system. It is too
            limiting.


        ============================================================
        FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
        Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
        to unsubscribe
        http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
        <http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com>
        FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
        <http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/> by Dr. Strangelove




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to