Oh.  Ok;  I thought you meant Liberals and I could not make that work.  Thanks 
for the clarification.

 

n

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of Roger Critchlow
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 2:21 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trump Is Just A Normal Polling Error Behind Clinton | 
FiveThirtyEight

 

Nick --

 

Just joking that Libertarians (ie libbies) should refuse to take campaign 
funding from the government and refuse to participate in government run 
elections, or they're clearly acting as LINO's (Libertarians In Name Only).  
Sorry, it was an old joke the first time.

 

-- rec --

 

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Nick Thompson <nickthomp...@earthlink.net 
<mailto:nickthomp...@earthlink.net> > wrote:

Hi Roger, 

 

Perhaps my humor and imagination have been totally destroyed by this election 
(which somebody aptly described as a political dumpster fire), but … I didn’t 
understand your comment,  AND I want to. 

 

Nick 

 

Nicholas S. Thompson

Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Biology

Clark University

 <http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/> 
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/

 

From: Friam [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com 
<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> ] On Behalf Of Roger Critchlow
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 1:04 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com 
<mailto:friam@redfish.com> >
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Trump Is Just A Normal Polling Error Behind Clinton | 
FiveThirtyEight

 

Aren't the libbies constitutionally required to disdain funding from the 
government?  Seems like they should disdain elections, too, hold out for 
victory by acclamation?

 

-- rec --

 

 

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:28 PM, ┣glen┫ <geprope...@gmail.com 
<mailto:geprope...@gmail.com> > wrote:

On 11/04/2016 09:53 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> http://www.slate.com/features/pkremp_forecast/report.html

Very nice presentation.  Thanks, Marcus!

On 11/04/2016 10:46 AM, Steven A Smith wrote:
> I was going to "scoff" at this number and analysis until I checked MY 
> favorite source and saw what people who were putting their money where their 
> mouths are were saying:
>
> https://tippie.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/

That's only 1 market.  Predictwise (which I may have heard about on this list?) 
aggregates some markets:
http://predictwise.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/PredictWise_November4_ChartPres.png

But, were I to play the market(s), I'd bet on both Clinton and Trump, of 
course, in various amounts.  So, it's not clear whether these markets are 
predictive of the winner so much as they're predictive of strategies for 
benefiting from the winner, who[m]ever it may be.

> Is that chasm recently formed, the FBI's "October Surprise"?   There sure is 
> a lot of volatility!

My hypothesis is that Clinton's drop in the polls is a result of the 
late-comers digging into the subject.  Anyone who has been paying attention to 
Trump and Clinton for more than a month or two, will have already formed their 
opinion.  More emails (or more sex harassment allegations) won't affect that.  
But those who only started really paying attention last month may just now be 
starting to dig in and think about the extent of Clinton's and Trump's foibles 
and qualities.  The falsifying question would be: What % of pollees answered 
prematurely back before October? ... didn't answer "undecided", but were likely 
to change their minds once they started digging?

I'm also fond of PollyVote: https://pollyvote.com/en/ ... though I also forget 
where I learned about that one. [sigh]

> Gary and Jill only need 5% of the vote to get their party's funding and 
> automatic ballot inclusion next round.

It would be great to see the Green party get the funding.  I wouldn't celebrate 
the Libertarians getting it, though.

--
␦glen?

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

 

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to