I don't feel hijacked. Thanks for the summary of Horgan's book. Don't have
much to add at this point.

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:44 PM Robert Wall <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Russ, Steve, et al.,
>
> I should tell you that I am reading John Horgan's *The End of Science:
> Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age*
> (2015 edition).  Such an ominous title!  I know.  But here Horgan concludes
> for many scientific endeavors the job is finished [link to a critique of
> the book]
> <http://www.nytimes.com/1996/06/30/books/the-job-is-finished.html?pagewanted=all>
> for all practical purposes.
>
> Horgan thinks that we aren't likely to see any new Kuhnian paradigm shifts
> like with quantum mechanics or general and special relativity anytime soon,
> if ever.  We will likely only see gap-filling activities, so to speak, like
> with the Higgs particle in helping to complete the standard model of
> particle physics.  But this is all good too.  It is just not *new *knowledge.
> Eh?
>
> In the meantime, Horgan coins the term *ironic science* to classify what
> we seem to be doing now in science like, for example, in physics and its
> close cousin cosmology, where science is becoming untestable.  *Beauty *[e.g.,
> mathematical elegance] seems to be the current standard for
> verification--it begs the issue as to whether we are discovering or
> inventing Reality.  To falsify String Theory--the leading candidate for the 
> *Theory
> of Everything*--we would need a super-conducting super collider the size
> of the galaxy ... well, larger than we could practically make or even
> afford at least--and that is becoming an issue as well.  What we would be
> looking for is something that is neither matter nor energy: a
> multi-dimensional string that gives rise to properties found in our
> universe depending on the frequency of the vibrations. So, is this a
> reasonable priority when the returns are ever diminishing, as Horgan
> contends?
>
> I read this very clever analogy for these strings.  Imagine God as a
> Cosmic Rocker playing his ten- or eleven-string guitar as the cosmos
> unfolds from his Big Bang amplifier.  Here's the compelling question: Is
> God playing to a particular musical score?  One that ultimately gives rise
> to humans and substance for consciousness?  Strong anthropic principle
> anyone?
>
> There was a thought-provoking argument I read somewhere recently about the
> federal grants given to scientific research. Given that science research
> like with Super-String Theory is and has been arguably bleeding over into
> metaphysics, philosophy, or even religion (e.g., Edward Witten), we may
> need to amend the US Constitution to include a clause [or intention] for
> the separation between science and state.  This action would imply that any
> and all scientific research would need to stand on its own.  This might be
> overkill, but the objective is kind of in the wheelhouse for the newly
> emerging Center for Open Science <https://cos.io/>--an institution that
> arose with the expose of bad science studies in medicine
> <http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/11/lies-damned-lies-and-medical-science/308269/>
> found in science journals and reported
> <https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiM3e3rhuLMAhVX3mMKHZxNBE8QFgguMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjournals.plos.org%2Fplosmedicine%2Farticle%3Fid%3D10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0020124&usg=AFQjCNGnlrRZK18zALFoV13bVKFpywymjg&sig2=erIO_WZ6jK3DgZsqfdLu2w&bvm=bv.122129774,d.cGc>
> by Dr. John Ioannidis last decade.
>
> I still like John Horgan as a skeptic and science writer and I appreciated
> the link provided by Steve for the Science of Consciousness Conference that
> I could not attend and which Horgan describes as not having come very far
> since his first visit in 1994.  Ironic science?  It would seem so IMHO.
> Oh.  Here is SciAm's From Complexity to Perplexity
> <http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/hogan.complexperplex.htm> outside
> the paywall.
>
> I hope I haven't hijacked this thread, which seems to be more about
> consciousness and ... monism (?).  But, in that context, I *have *long
> been hoping that we could crank up the energy in the Large Hadron Collider
> to find the *mind particle* and *prove *folks like the recently turned
> panpsychistic and American neuroscientist Christof Koch correct.  😎
>
> Cheers,
>
> Robert
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Russ Abbott <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Steve,
>>
>> Thanks for the pointer to the John Horgan posts
>> <http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/dispatch-from-the-desert-of-consciousness-research-part-1/>
>> about the Consciousness conference in Arizona. (I can't find your post to
>> reply to. I thought it was in this thread.)
>>
>> I had dismissed Horgan after his posts saying something like science was
>> dead. But this redeems him in my view.
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:19 AM glen â›§ <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 05/16/2016 07:55 PM, Nick Thompson wrote:
>>> > Pfft?
>>>
>>> Sorry.  That's my attempt to write a raspberry ... I don't know the
>>> emoticon... =P  maybe ... :-r ?  Of course, pfft is a "dry" raspberry.  To
>>> get the right effect, you have to stick your tongue out ... but you can't
>>> do that in polite company.  Plus, a dry raspberry is like throwing up your
>>> hands or shrugging.  "Pfft, I don't know where to go from here."  A wet
>>> raspberry is more playful, more context- and less content-driven.
>>>
>>> --
>>> â›§ glen
>>>
>>> ============================================================
>>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>>> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>
>>
>> ============================================================
>> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
>> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
>> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
>>
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to