I've been fascinated by "paraconsistency" since I learned of it (whenever that was). And
since the other tangent of the thread is about "rationality", I'll cite this page instead
of the much better pages that exist:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Paraconsistent_logic
I've been amused by the status of rational wiki. It's called a "hit site" by some
"alternative medicine" people. I think it might be dominated by less wrong types (who,
themselves have fractured at least twice, one branch of which is the neoreactionaries, which
probably raises the hackles of anyone whose hackles are raised by libertarians). What a wonderful
tapestry our gray matter constructs, eh?
On 12/28/2015 12:33 PM, Grant Holland wrote:
Oh yes, it need not be neither. It just can't be both!
Grant
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 28, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Grant Holland <[email protected]> wrote:
Glen, Eric,
If "reality" is complete, must not then (assuming that it is at least as
complex as arithmetic), aka Godel, it be also inconsistent?
--
⇔ glen
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
