Wow.  Either staring at flat screens is _fun_ for you people, or you need to 
learn to take the weekend off. 8^)

On 02/15/2015 04:51 PM, Victoria Hughes wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 4:05 PM, Steve Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> What represents a responsible, enlightened balance between Faber, Sapiens 
>> and Ludens ?
>
> This is an excellent question. Thanks, Steve. 
> First, do you truly think it is possible or useful to have a balance between 
> Faber, Sapiens, and Ludens?
> Then what would it be? 
> My vote would be for a Taoist approach, responding to the needs of the moment 
> with the appropriate way of being. 

Of all the cool things said, this is the only thing I might have something 
useful to say about ... though it amounts to a "me too".  I think you've hit it 
right, Tory.  Steve's setup is a _false_ trichotomy ... (? Hm, maybe it's 
better to say the axiom of choice is fake ... or at least an oversimplified 
discretization?)  Invoking the Tao is the right response, as it's both 
indivisible and infinitely differentiable.

The real answer is that to play is to make is to understand (and its 
permutations -- to make is to understand is to play...).  I think the 
artificial classifications we impose are more about how we learned to talk over 
our ontogeny than it is a true classification.  Various languages are more 
natural for various tasks.  And while it can be useful to use a language in 
which an act/concept is difficult to express (e.g. describing music from an 
engineering perspective), it is less common for a reason (or set of reasons), 
namely the "natural" language for some act/concept usually is terse, condensed. 
 So, e.g. when a player talks to another player, they tend to speak a language 
that's dense and compressed, allowing them to communicate more, faster.

Of course, I tend toward the opposite.  I enjoy describing things in unnatural 
languages, which makes me an enemy of all 3 types.

p.s. That also means, that I am maximally offensive to Nick ... All Dionysians 
should claim their works are Apollonian and vice versa ... it's good to use 
unnatural languages.
-- 
⇒⇐ glen e. p. ropella
Kiss the sun to be alive


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to