On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 01:24:47AM -0600, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
> So, Russ S, 
> 
> when you say, 
> 
> "> I got lost at step 4 here. The obvious syllogism of (1), (2) & (3) is
> > that an emergent property is not a property of a micro entity. But
> > this doesn't surprise me, as its actually my definition of emergence."
> 
> Does that mean that you are comfortable saying that emergence is actually a
> relationship between two different properties of the same object. 
> 

Not exactly. It is more a relationship between languages. It is the
presence of a property (the emergent one) expressed in one language
that is impossible to express in the other language. We would normally
say the languages are incommensurate, although Glen used a neat term
for it the other day starting with "lexical" that raised the other
Russ's eyebrows.

> I agree that the emergent property ... "being a copying device" has to be a
> property of the macro entity.  But in this case, the CAUSE of the emergent
> property is also an emergent property, i.e., "being composed of parts
> arranged in a double helix".  
> 
>  Is saying that a wooden construction is strong because its members are
> formed in triangles is like saying that a ball rolls because it is round?  
> 
> You wouldnt be the first Russ to say that I am getting my knickers
> unnecessarily twisted over this, but it does seem .... queer .... to me in
> someway.  
> 

Um, well, maybe you are getting your knickers in a twist. I don't
really get your point, queer or no :(.

> NIck 
> Nicholas S. Thompson
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
> Clark University ([email protected])
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > [Original Message]
> > From: russell standish <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity
> Coffee Group <[email protected]>
> > Date: 9/26/2009 8:35:52 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Emergence Seminar, III: Wimsatt and Searle
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 07:50:53PM -0600, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
> > > All, 
> > > 
> > > As you all may remember, I had decided on the basis of my first two
> > > readings of Wimsatt, that his was the final word on the definition of
> > > emergence: a property of a macro-entity is emergent when it depends on
> the
> > > arrangement of the micro entities [in time and/or in space]. 
> > > Unfortunately, I read it a third time. 
> > > 
> > > I woke up in the middle of the night realizing what was wrong with his
> > > position.  
> > > 
> > > (1) Ineliminably, emergence has to do with the relation between macro
> and
> > > micro entities.  (I suppose somebody might challange that statement,
> but I
> > > dont think anybody has so far.)
> > > 
> > > (2) Emergent properties of a macro entity are those that are dependant
> on
> > > the arrangement of the micro entities.  
> > > 
> > > (3) But "An arrangement of X's" cannot be a property of any microentity
> > > (duh!). 
> > > 
> > > (4) There fore, whatever (2) IS a definition of, it cannot be a
> definition
> > > of emergence OR emergence does not have to do with relations among
> levels. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Back to the old drawing board.  
> > > 
> > > n 
> > > 
> >
> > I got lost at step 4 here. The obvious syllogism of (1), (2) & (3) is
> > that an emergent property is not a property of a micro entity. But
> > this doesn't surprise me, as its actually my definition of emergence.
> >
> > -- 
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
> > Mathematics                                  
> > UNSW SYDNEY 2052                     [email protected]
> > Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

-- 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 0425 253119 (mobile)
Mathematics                              
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [email protected]
Australia                                http://www.hpcoders.com.au
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to