All, 

As you all may remember, I had decided on the basis of my first two
readings of Wimsatt, that his was the final word on the definition of
emergence: a property of a macro-entity is emergent when it depends on the
arrangement of the micro entities [in time and/or in space]. 
Unfortunately, I read it a third time. 

I woke up in the middle of the night realizing what was wrong with his
position.  

(1) Ineliminably, emergence has to do with the relation between macro and
micro entities.  (I suppose somebody might challange that statement, but I
dont think anybody has so far.)

(2) Emergent properties of a macro entity are those that are dependant on
the arrangement of the micro entities.  

(3) But "An arrangement of X's" cannot be a property of any microentity
(duh!). 

(4) There fore, whatever (2) IS a definition of, it cannot be a definition
of emergence OR emergence does not have to do with relations among levels. 


Back to the old drawing board.  

n 

Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, 
Clark University ([email protected])
http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/




>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Nicholas Thompson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > the third meeting of the emergence seminar is tomorrow at 4pm at DS. 
The
> > readings are Searle's   REDUCTIONISM AND THE IRREDUCIBILITY OF
CONSCIOUSNESS
> > and wimsatt's AGREGATIVITY: REDUCTIVE HEURISTICS FOR FINDING EMERGENCE
both
> > from Bedau and Humphreys, EMERGENCE.
> >
> > I think the chief challange of our discussions will be trying to figure
out
> > the degree to which the two authors agree.  I was startled on second
reading
> > at the degree to which they agree on what constitutes emergence.
> >
> > SEARLE "...some other system features cannot be figured out just from
the
> > compositoin of the elements and environmental relationws; they have to
be
> > explained in terms of the causal interactions among the elements.  Let's
> > call these 'causally emergent system features.'"
> >
> > WIMSAT " An emergent property is --roughly-- a system property which is
> > dependent upon the mode of organization of the system's parts".
> >
> > These two definitions are by no means the same, but both allow for
emergence
> > to be a common place.
> >
> >  The two seem also to have similar views of what constitutes reduction.
> > Searle goes to the trouble to explicate five different kinds of
reduction,
> > but in the end, he lights on "causal reduction", in part because it
often
> > leads to the other kinds.
> >
> > SEARLE :  A causal reduction has taken place when "the causal powers of
the
> > reduced entity [i.e., the macro-level entity] are shown to be entirely
> > explainable in thers of the causal powers of the reducing phenomena
[i.e.,
> > the micro-level phenomena]"  Odd that he changes from entity to
phenomena in
> > mid definition, but I am supposed to be avoiding editorial comment here.
> >
> > WIMSAT:  .... a reductive explanation of a behavior or a property of a
> > system is one showing it to be mechanistically explainable in terms of
the
> > properties of and interactions among the parts of the system."  A lot
would
> > seem to hang on the word "mechanistically" here, so I looked it up in
web
> > dictionary of philosophical terms. maintained by garth kemerling:
> >
> > mechanism
> >
> > Belief that science can explain all natural phenomena in terms of the
causal
> > interactions among material particles, without any reference to
intelligent
> > agency or purpose. As employed by Descartes and Hobbes, mechanism
offered an
> > alternative to the scholastic reliance on explanatory appeals to final
> > causes.
> >
> > Is there anybody out there who is reading along with us????
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > Nicholas S. Thompson
> > Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology,
> > Clark University ([email protected])
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~nickthompson/naturaldesigns/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ============================================================
> > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
> >



============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to