Nicholas Thompson wrote:
I studied Kant when I was too young and foolish to know better... but then I had been raised on folks like Ayn Rand and Robert Heinlein so Kant was no challenge. Today I think I would find Kant a bit intimidating. I am curious about the implications of "one of the skills I most revere is the ability to state another person's position to that person's satisfaction". It seems to have implications on the root discussion... The two ways I can obtain a high degree of confidence that I am communicating with another is if I can articulate their position to their satisfaction and vice versa... I prefer the former over the latter... in the sense that I am almost never satisfied in their articulation... at most I accept it with some reservations. But if they can keep a straight face while I reel off my version of their understanding of a point, then I try hard not to think too hard about it and call it good. How (if at all) does this fit into the 3rd/1st person discussion this all started with? - Steve |
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
