Dear all,
I wanted to ask you a question about longitudinal TRACULA analysis. I'm 
analyzing a group of patients with different time points. In my configuration 
file, I used "affine registration from the individual T1 to the MNI T1 template 
with FLIRT and a correlation ratio cost" as the inter-subject registration 
method (set interreg = 1). However, I’m considering whether it might be better 
for my analysis to use "nonlinear registration from the individual FA map to a 
custom FA template with symmetric normalization from ANTs" (set interreg = 5).
I would appreciate your thoughts on this.
Thank you in advance.
Best regards,
Sara

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to