This is counter-intuitive but reasonable and expected. The distribution of cluster sizes changes as you change the CFT. When you raise the CFT, clusters get smaller, but the clusters under the null also get smaller  too. It may be that the smaller cluster size is actually less likely under the null when using the higher CFT

On 10/30/2024 8:52 PM, 이종훈(보건과학대학 의공학부) wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Dear Freesurfer expert,

I hope this email finds you well. I am currently working on a project involving FreeSurfer's cluster-wise correction methods, and I encountered an unexpected result when adjusting the Cluster-Forming Threshold (CFT) and Cluster-Wise Probability (CWP) values. I would greatly appreciate your expertise on this matter.

In my analysis, I observed that some regions were not detected when using a CFT of 1.3 and a CWP of 0.05. However, these regions emerged as significant when I increased the CFT to 2.0 while keeping the CWP constant at 0.05. This finding appears counterintuitive, as a higher CFT typically results in fewer clusters being detected due to the increased threshold for significance.

Could you please help clarify why this phenomenon might occur? Specifically:

 1. How might the higher CFT (2.0) interact with the CWP (0.05) to
    reveal regions that did not appear with a lower CFT (1.3)?
 2. Is it possible that the increase in CFT reduces noise or increases
    signal clarity in such a way that previously undetected clusters
    reach significance?

Thank you very much for your time and guidance. I look forward to any insights you can provide on this topic.

Jonghun Lee
Master's Student, Advanced Image Processing Technology Lab
Yonsei University


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to