External Email - Use Caution Hi there,
My question is related to FreeSurfer’s calculations for intracranial volume (ICV): Given the importance to consider ICV as a potential covariate when assessing volumetric differences in ROIs between groups, which ICV output is recommended? FreeSurfer’s recon-all generates eTIV (which is widely used by default in literature, and is a registration-based method). Conversely, the SAMSEG pipeline generates sbTIV (relatively newer approach which is a segmentation-based method). While these two would be the most obvious choice, many papers also consider correcting for supratentorial volume to be an appropriate approach. To some degree, the choice of method would be guided by the research question. However in the most simple of cases (e.g., non-clinical cohorts), what method is recommended? Why would someone, for example, opt to use sbTIV over eTIV? Warm regards, Jackson Lee
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> . Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
