Dear Dawn, Integrating the hippocampal subfields into SynthSeg in on the to-do list, but it’s tricky due to differences in resolution. In terms of robustness, we are making progress – but I like your suggestion of adding defacing to the list of “artifacts”! We’ll take it into consideration 😊 Cheers, /Eugenio
-- Juan Eugenio Iglesias http://www.jeiglesias.com From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Dawn Matthews <dmatth...@admdx.com> Date: Sunday, October 29, 2023 at 1:18 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: [Freesurfer] SynthSEG continued developments External Email - Use Caution Thank you for all of the work of the FreeSurfer team in continuing to make advances to the Freesurfer suite of tools. I wondered if you could comment on (a) any work or plans to include hippocampal subfield, brainstem subfield, or corpus callosum subfield segmentations, and (b) the robustness of SynthSEG to defacing/refacing software as compared to Freesurfer? Thanks very much.
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> . Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
