In general, I would recommend treating sex as a categorical rather than continuous variable. To do this, you would have 6 groups (your 3 x 2 sex). I'm not sure what you are trying to test for. Eg, are you interested in the difference between groups regressing out the effects of age, DD, and sex? Or are you interested in, eg, the effect of age regressing out the other stuff?

On 6/14/2023 3:59 PM, Cristina A. F. Román wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

Hello,

I am looking to run a MANCOVA to examine cortical gray matter differences across three groups (accounting for several covariates), and I was hoping to get input on whether I am setting up my design matrix correctly.

Groups: 3
Covariates: Age (demeaned), disease duration (DD; demeaned), sex

Simplified Example:
Group   EV1(Grp1)    EV2(Grp2)     EV3(Grp3)     EV4(age)  EV5(DD)    EV6(sex) 1            1                     0                  0          0.25           0.75            -1 1            1                     0                  0          0.25           0.25            -1 1            0                     1                  0         -0.75          -0.25            1 1            0                     1                  0          0.5            -0.75            1 1            0                     0                  1         -0.5             0.5              1 1            0                     0                  1          0.25           0.25            -1

Questions:

1. Is this an appropriate way to do a three-group comparison with covariates? Or, is it better to just run three separate t-tests (including covariates)?

2. Regarding post-hoc testing, would I just do three separate t-tests? This issue here, I imagine, is that the individual t-test results may not reflect the original MANCOVA results (e.g., post-hoc testing reveals a new significant area that was not significant in the MANCOVA).

3. One other option is to run the initial MANCOVA within a statistical program (i.e., using global cortical gray matter volumes) and then follow up with postdoc testing within FSL (i.e., t-tests). Would this make sense?

Thanks in advance for your time and help,
Cristina



_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to