why are you doing this with modulation instead of just designating 3
different conditions?
On 3/28/2023 1:36 PM, Gillian Grennan wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Hi Freesurfer Developers,
I am analyzing a fear conditioning imaging study and am attempting to
regress out the shock/unconditioned stimulus by adjusting the
modulation weights in my par file. I set the stimuli presented with
the shock (CS+) with a modulation weight of -1 and set all other
unshocked/unpaired stimuli (CS- and fixation) with a weight of 1.
Similarly, we have a few CS+ trials where the participants are
expecting a shock but didn't receive one -- I have been setting these
with a modulation weight of 1 similar to the CS- and fixation stimuli.
I attached a copy of our .par file. Could you let me know if this
makes sense for our analyses?
Best,
Gillian Grennan
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of
this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
