External Email - Use Caution        

Dear FS developers,

Hi, I'm Yoonho.
I know that new features, such as SynthSeg, SynthStrip, segment_subfields
(beta version), etc, based on deep learning have been added after the
FreeSurfer 7.3.2.
Here I have questions (I read papers related to SynthSR, SynthSeg,
SynthStrip, segment_subfields).

*1. Can I use the SynthSR functions o**nly by FreeSurfer development (dev)
version 
(https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ps3QL5XW2qOOptSgD9TqOIsWnQJlFGcz9nxZ59lvSiCbI0zAyu9rH494zDXoBNb27gg8wc3mz4Qz8TYV3WW5NPN9nFsTL-FDMbvhZXIjaWp4l6sfUKU_JwXBnSSafegfW3eIiHFruSaXD7Ruhis6SbHMMQGHC6FkqmJnEEQffGvtfNm5yUFzAyQEKRaZcFvw2vpJjdT_j26w0wJr_ihH8bLl9_vXjsOwQlEax5KS6HoOLF1IpKt4TSoqwnUEfDGxOdjiHVbsyLQA3IW2qHa_r8SpCNsc0kKaj6pyKreB1SfG45KHxzpj5q2xEDDopOe9ZfXqLnIjDuBByRdCGZJ1vw/https%3A%2F%2Fsurfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fpub%2Fdist%2Ffreesurfer%2Fdev%2F
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1ps3QL5XW2qOOptSgD9TqOIsWnQJlFGcz9nxZ59lvSiCbI0zAyu9rH494zDXoBNb27gg8wc3mz4Qz8TYV3WW5NPN9nFsTL-FDMbvhZXIjaWp4l6sfUKU_JwXBnSSafegfW3eIiHFruSaXD7Ruhis6SbHMMQGHC6FkqmJnEEQffGvtfNm5yUFzAyQEKRaZcFvw2vpJjdT_j26w0wJr_ihH8bLl9_vXjsOwQlEax5KS6HoOLF1IpKt4TSoqwnUEfDGxOdjiHVbsyLQA3IW2qHa_r8SpCNsc0kKaj6pyKreB1SfG45KHxzpj5q2xEDDopOe9ZfXqLnIjDuBByRdCGZJ1vw/https%3A%2F%2Fsurfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fpub%2Fdist%2Ffreesurfer%2Fdev%2F>)**?*

*2. When T1WI data are processed with recon-all, are SynthSR and SynthSeg
functions included in the "recon-all" process pipeline? If not, are SynthSR
and SynthSeg processed separately?*

*3. Is the recon-all process included in SynthSeg and SynthStrip by
default?*

*4. When I process T1WI data with Freesurfer dev version, is it installed
based on the new version in HPC per version update for freesurfer?*

*5. I think using SynthSR and SynthSeg functions can solve the
Harmonization issue (data acquired from other manufacturers (Siemens, GE,
Philips), protocols (FSPGR, MPRAGE, etc), and other sites). What do you
think about that?*

*6. In lh.w-g.pct.stats file, I know that "Mean" means GWC (gray/white
matter contrast), which is (100/0.5)*[(white matter intensity - gray matter
intensity)/(white matter intensity + gray matter intensity)], as far as I
know, I want to know in detail whether the 0.5 term should be omitted and
100 is to appear as a percentage.*

Thank you for reading my long question
Please let me know if there is anything you don't understand.
Looking forward to your feedback.
Thank you very much.

Sincerely,
Yoonho

--
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to