Right, I meant flatten the matrix into a vector/vertex, do the cross-subject 
mapping, then reshape it back to a matrix

-----Original Message-----
From: Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 12:24 PM
To: Fischl, Bruce <bfis...@mgh.harvard.edu>; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Resampling of surface-based bivariate data

You'd have do both the rows and the cols.

On 4/27/2022 11:44 AM, Fischl, Bruce wrote:
> Why not just flatten it and save it as a .mgz? Then I think it should be 
> straightforward
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 10:42 AM
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu; Fischl, Bruce <bfis...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Resampling of surface-based bivariate data
>
> No, there is not (at least that I know of). Bruce might have something along 
> these lines.
>
> On 4/26/2022 3:32 PM, Burke Rosen wrote:
>>           External Email - Use Caution
>>
>> Is there a way to resample a vertex-by-vertex matrix of data from one 
>> subject to another or to ico? For example, I have calculated the Euclidean 
>> distance matrix for all the vertices of lh.white for my subjects and wish to 
>> find the average distance matrix. Another example might be functional 
>> connectivity values.
>>
>> If the data were univariate (i.e. vectors not matrices), I could save my 
>> measure as a .w file for each subject and use mri_surf2surf to morph each 
>> vector to ico and then average across the resulting ico vectors. One idea is 
>> to use make_average_subject to morph each subject’s surface to ico and then 
>> calculate bivariate measures on these surfaces. This might be ok for the 
>> functional connectivity case. However, this morphing distorts the absolute 
>> size of the surface, so the Euclidean distance matrix would be untenably 
>> distorted.
>>
>> In other words, is there an extension of mri_surf2surf (or maybe 
>> mris_convert) that operates on v(i,j) measures rather than v(i) measures?
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> -Burke
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to