Assuming you used y = pre-post, then the correlation is the correlation
between y and age, so if it is positive it means that the pre-post
difference is increasing with age
On 12/16/2021 2:45 PM, PDMD SRALab wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
We are using the paired analysis approach as outlined here
(*MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
"secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/PairedAnalysis
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/13QTl-VyyAVXvg-0pygxBoVuOM74Yxhp2T1X_88Q9Q9Lh3ZcBaZjKeNXs8tO5B1CS4fZtvL61gNWMgdPO9MHB-7POi_LxXSWFzwW6PtmuEw4Guc640z00rTXgigZmocb05oKYXRzVyV2jqBD-8cyE_B7Z6jdYzIaLDICEgJbuKAhw78DX5l8Tj0Hb48p-ESRe9-FJFvp-SpJQzgKIOlAtppYluJ1RUmyGkhpNiaqgeVFSxd3Azo3E6z7ez5pANkWBsq_9iUepqDNSiuaFacX3p1cERenP__b7wqvD4a5afWTq6s743Bk_a7RuOcX9hmUY/https%3A%2F%2Fsurfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Ffswiki%2FPairedAnalysis>)
so yes we are subtracting the two time points explicitly and computing
a paired t-test as you suggested. I've attached both the first fsgd
file (pairs.fsgd) and the second fsgd file (paired-diff.fsgd) for
your reference.
Thanks for the help! - Doug M
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 5:49 PM Douglas N. Greve
<dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
Can you say more about your approach? Are you subtracting the two
time points explicitly and computing a paired t? Or are you using
the repeated measures anova approach. Send the FSGD file
On 11/30/2021 11:04 AM, PDMD SRALab wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
We are using a paired analysis approach to study cortical
thickness in a dataset with 2 timepoints (called pre-protocol and
post-protocol). Regarding the mean cluster summary (contrast: [1
0]), we understand positive values to mean pre > post (thinning)
and negative values to mean post > pre (thickening). The
covariate results are more difficult to interpret. For instance,
we’re interested in looking at the effects of age (contrast: [0
1]) on the cortical thickness results. In the age cluster
summary, is it fair to interpret positive results as positive
correlation (older subjects show more thickening) and negative
results as inverse correlation (older subjects show more
thinning) or is the interpretation more complex than this? We’re
getting mainly negative cluster results for age so this
interpretation may make sense, but we’d like more clarity. Thank
you for your help.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
"secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WeGUpbfdqUWSods4JqJRgXqQxv5cjYcbDLSvE5VMK-BO83L2caX5gjMrZfRhDKz-bbL-IUM1TOExtas1MEe_eZ89v-PD_VT2MHnvLRuLF3UG1DpCQU1DdJlxOTBnZMAh1nKdnPy17_dXUWdvpIsdcwXqa9fSSd93PWdlYRhLH1QepwxXsNTPDGnrDLXlDmb2kT9j4VUqzMbm5o0XpOcLYFk2yA6GF3Bi4r7NBBj97SgvNbFYuaNgsIeV42Z1gRXUd3AGeXudSv078eNIAOT8of8kL7Etrn8hdzC_3afFMmpcSbYXXI_p9-WZmz3-jguL/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
"secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WeGUpbfdqUWSods4JqJRgXqQxv5cjYcbDLSvE5VMK-BO83L2caX5gjMrZfRhDKz-bbL-IUM1TOExtas1MEe_eZ89v-PD_VT2MHnvLRuLF3UG1DpCQU1DdJlxOTBnZMAh1nKdnPy17_dXUWdvpIsdcwXqa9fSSd93PWdlYRhLH1QepwxXsNTPDGnrDLXlDmb2kT9j4VUqzMbm5o0XpOcLYFk2yA6GF3Bi4r7NBBj97SgvNbFYuaNgsIeV42Z1gRXUd3AGeXudSv078eNIAOT8of8kL7Etrn8hdzC_3afFMmpcSbYXXI_p9-WZmz3-jguL/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer>
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you
in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please
contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at
*MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
"secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline
<http://secure-web.cisco.com/187ps7Rfm-qKpuzmaylI7t8yekHGADbfBSjAZfdoFmeTSsdn1ilcbOIf9LIktcA1N0EodcwswEd9R5MLXYr7bwGtSgmzUbSpnXFi_SJjXh0Vh7D9GLIG5kQb_CqkOtb-_0KmZFEvstWK59RxEnPsfHK6Yyhpzq3JltufMDkC_w-XcOjPbGwKIPbqw6a2BsHtJ9F5iz6faKS89PjvzPzakF8jZcOOWPMKHraqwrhfk4C_tNSNZCArBHf1n9rBHx2YFRY8gmbh-IOkTKjqCliMw6KNfn_g4A0LK95UF0a8EJ--WVCeAT2FpvGCZOyGyPON3/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline>
. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain
patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do
not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please
notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send
or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you
understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to
communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information,
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of
this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.