Assuming you used y = pre-post, then the correlation is the correlation between y and age, so if it is positive it means that the pre-post difference is increasing with age



On 12/16/2021 2:45 PM, PDMD SRALab wrote:

        External Email - Use Caution

We are using the paired analysis approach as outlined here (*MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be* https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/PairedAnalysis <https://secure-web.cisco.com/13QTl-VyyAVXvg-0pygxBoVuOM74Yxhp2T1X_88Q9Q9Lh3ZcBaZjKeNXs8tO5B1CS4fZtvL61gNWMgdPO9MHB-7POi_LxXSWFzwW6PtmuEw4Guc640z00rTXgigZmocb05oKYXRzVyV2jqBD-8cyE_B7Z6jdYzIaLDICEgJbuKAhw78DX5l8Tj0Hb48p-ESRe9-FJFvp-SpJQzgKIOlAtppYluJ1RUmyGkhpNiaqgeVFSxd3Azo3E6z7ez5pANkWBsq_9iUepqDNSiuaFacX3p1cERenP__b7wqvD4a5afWTq6s743Bk_a7RuOcX9hmUY/https%3A%2F%2Fsurfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Ffswiki%2FPairedAnalysis>) so yes we are subtracting the two time points explicitly and computing a paired t-test as you suggested. I've attached both the first fsgd file (pairs.fsgd) and the second fsgd file (paired-diff.fsgd) for your reference.
Thanks for the help! - Doug M

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 5:49 PM Douglas N. Greve <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

    Can you say more about your approach? Are you subtracting the two
    time points explicitly and computing a paired t? Or are you using
    the repeated measures anova approach. Send the FSGD file

    On 11/30/2021 11:04 AM, PDMD SRALab wrote:

            External Email - Use Caution

    We are using a paired analysis approach to study cortical
    thickness in a dataset with 2 timepoints (called pre-protocol and
    post-protocol). Regarding the mean cluster summary (contrast: [1
    0]), we understand positive values to mean pre > post (thinning)
    and negative values to mean post > pre (thickening). The
    covariate results are more difficult to interpret. For instance,
    we’re interested in looking at the effects of age (contrast: [0
    1]) on the cortical thickness results. In the age cluster
    summary, is it fair to interpret positive results as positive
    correlation (older subjects show more thickening) and negative
    results as inverse correlation (older subjects show more
    thinning) or is the interpretation more complex than this? We’re
    getting mainly negative cluster results for age so this
    interpretation may make sense, but we’d like more clarity. Thank
    you for your help.


    _______________________________________________
    Freesurfer mailing list
    Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
    *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
    "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
    https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer  
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WeGUpbfdqUWSods4JqJRgXqQxv5cjYcbDLSvE5VMK-BO83L2caX5gjMrZfRhDKz-bbL-IUM1TOExtas1MEe_eZ89v-PD_VT2MHnvLRuLF3UG1DpCQU1DdJlxOTBnZMAh1nKdnPy17_dXUWdvpIsdcwXqa9fSSd93PWdlYRhLH1QepwxXsNTPDGnrDLXlDmb2kT9j4VUqzMbm5o0XpOcLYFk2yA6GF3Bi4r7NBBj97SgvNbFYuaNgsIeV42Z1gRXUd3AGeXudSv078eNIAOT8of8kL7Etrn8hdzC_3afFMmpcSbYXXI_p9-WZmz3-jguL/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer>

    _______________________________________________
    Freesurfer mailing list
    Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
    *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
    "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
    https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
    
<https://secure-web.cisco.com/1WeGUpbfdqUWSods4JqJRgXqQxv5cjYcbDLSvE5VMK-BO83L2caX5gjMrZfRhDKz-bbL-IUM1TOExtas1MEe_eZ89v-PD_VT2MHnvLRuLF3UG1DpCQU1DdJlxOTBnZMAh1nKdnPy17_dXUWdvpIsdcwXqa9fSSd93PWdlYRhLH1QepwxXsNTPDGnrDLXlDmb2kT9j4VUqzMbm5o0XpOcLYFk2yA6GF3Bi4r7NBBj97SgvNbFYuaNgsIeV42Z1gRXUd3AGeXudSv078eNIAOT8of8kL7Etrn8hdzC_3afFMmpcSbYXXI_p9-WZmz3-jguL/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer>
    The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to
    whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you
    in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please
    contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at
    *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
    "secure-web.cisco.com" claiming to be*
    http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline
    
<http://secure-web.cisco.com/187ps7Rfm-qKpuzmaylI7t8yekHGADbfBSjAZfdoFmeTSsdn1ilcbOIf9LIktcA1N0EodcwswEd9R5MLXYr7bwGtSgmzUbSpnXFi_SJjXh0Vh7D9GLIG5kQb_CqkOtb-_0KmZFEvstWK59RxEnPsfHK6Yyhpzq3JltufMDkC_w-XcOjPbGwKIPbqw6a2BsHtJ9F5iz6faKS89PjvzPzakF8jZcOOWPMKHraqwrhfk4C_tNSNZCArBHf1n9rBHx2YFRY8gmbh-IOkTKjqCliMw6KNfn_g4A0LK95UF0a8EJ--WVCeAT2FpvGCZOyGyPON3/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.massgeneralbrigham.org%2Fcomplianceline>
    . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain
    patient information, please contact the sender and properly
    dispose of the e-mail.
    Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do
    not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please
    notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send
    or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you
    understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to
    communicate over unencrypted e-mail.


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If 
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, 
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to