Did the size of the defect change?
On 9/19/2021 8:36 PM, Paul, Rahul wrote:
Hi freesurfer experts,
I was using FreeSurfer v6 for my research. Recently, I started move to
FreeSurfer v7.2.
I encountered the following issue:
Some patients, that had extra large error (xL error), were running
fine (recon-all) in freesurfer 6 (it took time, but the process
finished, and the segmentation was fine too) but in freesurfer 7, same
patient recon-all encountered the extra large error (e.g., CORRECTING
DEFECT 35 (vertices=9718, convex hull=1801, v0=40087 Command
terminated by signal 11) and after couple of hours recon-all exited
(recon-all -s 8375 exited with ERRORS ). I am not sure why recon-all
is existing for freesurfer 7.2 and how can I stop that.
Thank you
Rahul
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information,
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of
this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
